Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Too bad nospam can't see this: Apple adds call recording to iOS
 18
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 10:37:02 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <v9g5ju$6jo$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v89e2i$1jjn$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lcOcnQk0BcyX9Sj7nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v979f1$h7ef$1@dont-email.me>
 <v993a3$105ka$1@dont-email.me> <v99tlt$274vt$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9a3r0$12h97$1@solani.org> <v9c3l3$34l19$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0oph1kt3z6flm000@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v9d7oo$3bb12$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0oph7l647atky002@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v9db8h$3c4g7$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0oph9ty4aeib1004@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v9dg6r$3caij$4@dont-email.me>
 <xn0ophayo4bwa4a005@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v9djof$3cajp$2@dont-email.me> <v9dp7f$14d1j$1@solani.org>
 <v9dsjc$3fa3o$1@dont-email.me> <v9ef35$15h4l$1@solani.org>
 <v9efpu$3iasl$1@dont-email.me> <v9f7tc$156re$1@solani.org>
 <v9fs8c$3u8km$4@dont-email.me>
 <xn0opimlc5nddzr003@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v9furo$3u8m7$5@dont-email.me>
 <xn0opinuv5p23v6004@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v9g46a$3vp9b$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0opipt45rqlto005@reader443.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 19:37:02 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6fb3ff4bc55d0f31a78abd7f24b8e54d";
	logging-data="6776"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/BgCBMM6ojYf0ERPJ1c0QRM/tRKu2L+5o="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nKDp5wIP/NknOKYVjqq4KuSQKhA=
Content-Language: en-CA
In-Reply-To: <xn0opipt45rqlto005@reader443.eternal-september.org>
Bytes: 3757

On 2024-08-13 10:33, badgolferman wrote:
> Alan wrote:
> 
>> On 2024-08-13 09:18, badgolferman wrote:
>>> Alan wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2024-08-13 08:31, badgolferman wrote:
>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Now answer my question.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now we have moved on to an interrogation from the bulldog who
>>>>> can never let go.
>>>>
>>>> Now we have moved to the phase where you refuse to have a
>>>> discussion, and instead reply with memes.
>>>>
>>>> Back on the topic of whether anyone has ever come back from the
>>>> dead:
>>>>
>>>> Do you understand that doctors (science) currently have incomplete
>>>> information about what actually constitutes whether or not a
>>>> person is ACTUALLY dead?
>>>>
>>>> Yes or no.
>>>
>>> It's interesting how you frame your question in a sly way so you
>>> will be right however I answer it.  It would be more honest of you
>>> to just state your case rather than attempt to walk me into your
>>> trap.
>>>
>>
>> My case is that someone who currently is declared dead by the tests
>> available to us today who "comes back to life" was never dead in the
>> first place.
>>
>> Just like people who were declared dead because they had no pulse
>> were never actually dead back when THAT was the metric used to
>> declare death.
> 
> 
> Those people were declared dead by the science (doctors) of the time.

But we now KNOW they weren't... ...right?

Those doctors were wrong, because they didn't understand things as well 
as we do now... ...right?

> Using the standards of today to judge people from the past is unfair.

I'm not judging PEOPLE. Well... ...except you.