Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v9gc9i$1nqu$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Gerry Jackson <do-not-use@swldwa.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: Juggling system-compilation items
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 20:31:00 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <v9gc9i$1nqu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v957nr$jq4q$2@dont-email.me> <v9bdpm$2sbsi$1@dont-email.me>
 <nnd$37164d96$3acc3df6@43c3aecde4ca6b05>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 21:30:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="34f91b65ee2b7388af44d7389fcf9260";
	logging-data="57182"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19zmzNSZ/fSss8ZLz1MpJd6yeGBJF1ofaU="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Io8oSTfoatKjsvfNaD+X96nHSds=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <nnd$37164d96$3acc3df6@43c3aecde4ca6b05>
Bytes: 2189

On 12/08/2024 10:45, albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl wrote:
> In article<v9bdpm$2sbsi$1@dont-email.me>,
> Gerry Jackson<do-not-use@swldwa.uk>  wrote:
>> ISTM that using the data stack to hold the control stack is an
>> anachronism that was used in early Forth systems because of the limited
>> amount of memory available. I also think that the system should not get
>> in the way of user programs as putting control stack data on the data
>> stack certainly does.
> It alleviates restriction. Marcel Hendrix hated the restrictions of
> R> >R and added the socalled "system stack" S> >S that can be used
> over definitions. The disadvantage is of course that there are more
> regions of memory that you have to keep track of.
> I think that added complexity is a more important consideration as
> memory usage. The more stacks you have and the more stack items
> you keep in registers, the more difficult e.g. task switching becomes.

As use of a control stack is during compilation, speed is not too 
important so why would register(s) be used for it?

-- 
Gerry