Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Too bad nospam can't see this: Apple adds call recording to iOS
 18
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:42:00 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 75
Message-ID: <v9ggeo$18q8$6@dont-email.me>
References: <v89e2i$1jjn$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v993a3$105ka$1@dont-email.me> <v99tlt$274vt$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9a3r0$12h97$1@solani.org> <v9c3l3$34l19$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0oph1kt3z6flm000@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v9d7oo$3bb12$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0oph7l647atky002@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v9db8h$3c4g7$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0oph9ty4aeib1004@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v9dg6r$3caij$4@dont-email.me>
 <xn0ophayo4bwa4a005@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v9djof$3cajp$2@dont-email.me> <v9dp7f$14d1j$1@solani.org>
 <v9dsjc$3fa3o$1@dont-email.me> <v9ef35$15h4l$1@solani.org>
 <v9efpu$3iasl$1@dont-email.me> <v9f7tc$156re$1@solani.org>
 <v9fs8c$3u8km$4@dont-email.me>
 <xn0opimlc5nddzr003@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v9furo$3u8m7$5@dont-email.me>
 <xn0opinuv5p23v6004@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v9g46a$3vp9b$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0opipt45rqlto005@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v9g5ju$6jo$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0opitv05x6991006@reader443.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 22:42:01 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6fb3ff4bc55d0f31a78abd7f24b8e54d";
	logging-data="41800"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+TTHQXJkSyT5mjI2+iszJqv0LaQVLTJIY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:or8eflVLoM9wus24Uu2fn+tSuMA=
In-Reply-To: <xn0opitv05x6991006@reader443.eternal-september.org>
Content-Language: en-CA
Bytes: 4230

On 2024-08-13 13:05, badgolferman wrote:
> Alan wrote:
> 
>> On 2024-08-13 10:33, badgolferman wrote:
>>> Alan wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2024-08-13 09:18, badgolferman wrote:
>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-08-13 08:31, badgolferman wrote:
>>>>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now answer my question.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now we have moved on to an interrogation from the bulldog
>>>>>>> who can never let go.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now we have moved to the phase where you refuse to have a
>>>>>> discussion, and instead reply with memes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Back on the topic of whether anyone has ever come back from
>>>>>> the dead:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you understand that doctors (science) currently have
>>>>>> incomplete information about what actually constitutes
>>>>>> whether or not a person is ACTUALLY dead?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes or no.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's interesting how you frame your question in a sly way so you
>>>>> will be right however I answer it.  It would be more honest of
>>>>> you to just state your case rather than attempt to walk me into
>>>>> your trap.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My case is that someone who currently is declared dead by the
>>>> tests available to us today who "comes back to life" was never
>>>> dead in the first place.
>>>>
>>>> Just like people who were declared dead because they had no pulse
>>>> were never actually dead back when THAT was the metric used to
>>>> declare death.
>>>
>>>
>>> Those people were declared dead by the science (doctors) of the
>>> time.
>>
>> But we now KNOW they weren't... ...right?
>>
>> Those doctors were wrong, because they didn't understand things as
>> well as we do now... ...right?
>>
>>> Using the standards of today to judge people from the past is
>>> unfair.
>>
>> I'm not judging PEOPLE. Well... ...except you.
> 
> 
> Nope.  They were pronounced dead then and are most likely dead now.

Now who's playing games.

> 
> Who are you to question the smartest men of the time? 

I'm not questioning them. I'm noting there lack of sufficient information.


> You're not even
> the smartest man in this room!

I'm smarter than you...

....and this isn't a "room".