Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v9gp90$40b4$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Geoff <geoff@geoffwood.org> Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital Subject: Re: DSLR and Mirrorless - Filter ? Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 11:12:31 +1200 Organization: Dis Lines: 21 Message-ID: <v9gp90$40b4$1@dont-email.me> References: <v9ei8e$3n3r1$1@dont-email.me> <v9f1rk$3pho0$1@dont-email.me> <v9f21j$3pm9q$1@dont-email.me> <v9f9nn$3r167$1@dont-email.me> Reply-To: geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 01:12:32 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="54429159f8dd82ef75c2078355f90e1f"; logging-data="131428"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19mIt7X2NGmJxSILf+DiBqA0zlBZZtYnIM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:MvzVY9P8RUl6WREpICF1n/aDF/I= In-Reply-To: <v9f9nn$3r167$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1692 On 13/08/2024 9:41 pm, Abandoned Trolley wrote: > >>> >>> I owned at least one telephoto lens which suffered from vignetting >>> caused by the supplied lens hood >> >> I think it would be a bit of a scandal if a Nikon piece did that .... >> >> geoff > > Perhaps - although I have been told that "they have all done it" at some > time or other, and apparently it doesnt even need a telehoto lens. > > My example was an Olympus OM lens with the supplied lens hood. > Well a wide-angle lens would like be more susceptible that a tele, spanning a, um, wider angle .... geoff