Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v9gp90$40b4$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Geoff <geoff@geoffwood.org>
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: DSLR and Mirrorless - Filter ?
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 11:12:31 +1200
Organization: Dis
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <v9gp90$40b4$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v9ei8e$3n3r1$1@dont-email.me> <v9f1rk$3pho0$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9f21j$3pm9q$1@dont-email.me> <v9f9nn$3r167$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 01:12:32 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="54429159f8dd82ef75c2078355f90e1f";
	logging-data="131428"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19mIt7X2NGmJxSILf+DiBqA0zlBZZtYnIM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MvzVY9P8RUl6WREpICF1n/aDF/I=
In-Reply-To: <v9f9nn$3r167$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1692

On 13/08/2024 9:41 pm, Abandoned Trolley wrote:
> 
>>>
>>> I owned at least one telephoto lens which suffered from vignetting 
>>> caused by the supplied lens hood
>>
>> I think it would be a bit of a scandal if a Nikon piece did that ....
>>
>> geoff
> 
> Perhaps - although I have been told that "they have all done it" at some 
> time or other, and apparently it doesnt even need a telehoto lens.
> 
> My example was an Olympus OM lens with the supplied lens hood.
> 


Well a wide-angle lens would like be more susceptible that a tele, 
spanning a, um,  wider angle ....

geoff