Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 13:29:52 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <v9i4fg$bvnu$5@dont-email.me>
References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp>
 <65a73d72df3e6413ef3bd691f93dfa8a@www.novabbs.com>
 <17eb0d581e6ab05b$286747$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <03d91192917665366eed4777e19eeaba@www.novabbs.com>
 <v9e72s$3fish$3@dont-email.me>
 <28e6191fe1b0d86de8d155cedeb6592c@www.novabbs.com>
 <v9fmve$3t7j7$2@dont-email.me>
 <1ba79173ec9450b5c84be28c9f1964c0@www.novabbs.com>
 <v9fojc$3t7j7$5@dont-email.me>
 <964f235bdecde9d651c4352ec86d1fea@www.novabbs.com>
 <GJV9qXRqd8YR9_jKHPyTEFOBplg@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 13:29:52 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="aa9e3c618b242bf6bc25b214f448c8d1";
	logging-data="392958"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ApCoTxtprsIVk6tL30anR"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5172sVdwPBFZ3MJbLdDmYxLkZfs=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <GJV9qXRqd8YR9_jKHPyTEFOBplg@jntp>
Bytes: 4152

Le 13/08/2024 à 18:29, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
> Le 13/08/2024 à 17:15, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
> 
>   Should we believe EVERYTHING scientists say?

Of course not, but they are certainly more credible than a demented
old country doctor who pretends that SR is wrong, Einstein is a
"anglo-saxon plot", that the Titanic didn't collide with an iceberg,
has a lot of uninteresting claims about theology nobody cares about,
propagated numerous fake news and spend most of his time bragging about
the size of his genitals.

> There is something quite strange about human beings from a behavioral 
> point of view. They say that we must form our own ideas, have free will, 
> and not swallow everything we hear.
> But I have often noticed that they do the opposite.
> I have never understood this discrepancy.
> Don't laugh, friends, but it is quite logical, in the human system, that 
> people like the buffoon Python accuse me of being a conspiracy theorist, 
> because I am immensely more Cartesian than him insofar as I practice 
> methodical doubt (which has saved my life at least once).
> Let's take the case of Python. What could be less scientific than this 
> guy who swallows everything? The guy, you tell him that four days after 
> its first outing, the Titanic hit a flying saucer, he swallows it, and 
> those who doubt, he attacks them, he humiliates them, he harasses them, 
> he beats them up like an Orwellian police bob.
> Incapable of questioning an idea that was instilled in him (he read it 
> in the newspapers) he swallows it without even making a face.
> Should we believe what scientists say? Should we believe what the media 
> say? For him, yes, we must swallow everything and not think.
> Personally, I am a conspiracy theorist and damn, I love it.
> I think we must apply methodical doubt.
> And me, when someone tells me that the Titanic hit a flying saucer, I 
> don't believe it at all. The ship was poorly designed enough not to 
> break apart in half on its own in the middle of the ocean just hours 
> after it was launched.
> Problem: it's too inexpressible. What will entire nations think of us if 
> we reveal that Royal Navy ships break apart on their own as soon as they 
> are launched? We had to invert a flying saucer, and millions of little 
> Pythons would not only swallow it all, but declare total war on 
> conspiracy theorists and other doubters.

All this bullshit couldn't change anything to the FACT that I have
proven, black and white, that your claims are contradictory and
contradict the principle of Relativity.

You are evading the issue. You look as desperate as Donald Trump these
days.