Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v9i6ge$bvnu$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Python <python@invalid.org> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 14:04:30 +0200 Organization: CCCP Lines: 22 Message-ID: <v9i6ge$bvnu$6@dont-email.me> References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <65a73d72df3e6413ef3bd691f93dfa8a@www.novabbs.com> <17eb0d581e6ab05b$286747$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <03d91192917665366eed4777e19eeaba@www.novabbs.com> <v9e72s$3fish$3@dont-email.me> <28e6191fe1b0d86de8d155cedeb6592c@www.novabbs.com> <v9fmve$3t7j7$2@dont-email.me> <1ba79173ec9450b5c84be28c9f1964c0@www.novabbs.com> <v9fojc$3t7j7$5@dont-email.me> <964f235bdecde9d651c4352ec86d1fea@www.novabbs.com> <GJV9qXRqd8YR9_jKHPyTEFOBplg@jntp> <v9g8cc$3vsfg$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 14:04:30 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="aa9e3c618b242bf6bc25b214f448c8d1"; logging-data="392958"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+kNEIZZvgUPh1lAGGhNw+C" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:vPFvV42EzJpT9dF5DrTKV2CJlLc= In-Reply-To: <v9g8cc$3vsfg$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2239 Le 13/08/2024 à 20:24, Paul.B.Andersen a écrit : > Den 13.08.2024 18:29, skrev Richard Hachel: >> Let's take the case of Python. What could be less scientific than this >> guy who swallows everything? > > He doesn't swallow what you tell him. > Maybe that's because he is able to think for himself? This is a common trend among cranks: "This is right because *I* said it and you are not even allowed to contest *me*!". This could be called "authoritarianism with authority". Another crank on fr.sci.* is using this a lot, Jacques Lavau. His hobby is to pretend to have discovered, independently from Cramer, the transactional interpretation of QM while he was a student. This is of course ridiculous when it comes to confronting his own "work" to Cramer's one.