Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: key error in all the proofs --- Mike's correction
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 12:45:48 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <v9iqgc$go4j$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me>
 <0f8f134fe961ee00910cce1d7f05b632d7567c6c@i2pn2.org>
 <v9abfu$2nabt$1@dont-email.me>
 <86c21e8a63450bf8b0c32f4f17ba0b503a914fe0@i2pn2.org>
 <v9d01i$39tbd$2@dont-email.me>
 <2c853efb65c3d8e2d4ba1c484f7002c74c68d895@i2pn2.org>
 <v9d1v8$3a9pe$1@dont-email.me>
 <e614d6b981fd5fa6eefc84894a14448d4663e3c7@i2pn2.org>
 <v9da2d$3bth4$1@dont-email.me>
 <64ddeeaa3a55a9e410de599bd8df53d3644ee5a3@i2pn2.org>
 <v9de0o$3cjse$1@dont-email.me> <v9dela$3cjse$2@dont-email.me>
 <b7c45ea22cb83908c31d909b67f4921156be52e3@i2pn2.org>
 <v9dgvl$3d1an$1@dont-email.me>
 <d289636b1d244acaf00108f46df093a9fd5aa27c@i2pn2.org>
 <v9dk2j$3dp9h$1@dont-email.me>
 <8318f5969aa3074e542747fe6ba2916d7f599bde@i2pn2.org>
 <TyKdnc3hCNvmUyf7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <v9ekta$3necg$1@dont-email.me>
 <2f8c1b0943d03743fe9894937092bc2832e0a029@i2pn2.org>
 <v9fn50$3ta4u$2@dont-email.me> <v9hmfc$c71c$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9ic89$f16v$6@dont-email.me>
 <06ea0f3a1ff938643b3dfefdf62af15559593733@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 19:45:49 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0b9b77ee625b8578b747fee4cc5a1452";
	logging-data="549011"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+AeX7kmX1EposGzGtqaPlC"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:m7cTVxekS+ehOT+DOkZqZpZaXTs=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <06ea0f3a1ff938643b3dfefdf62af15559593733@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 3399

On 8/14/2024 11:31 AM, joes wrote:
> Am Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:42:33 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>> On 8/14/2024 2:30 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2024-08-13 13:30:08 +0000, olcott said:
>>>> On 8/13/2024 6:23 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 8/12/24 11:45 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its* *own
>>>>>> "return" instruction final halt state, thus never halts*
>>>>>>
>>>>> Which is only correct if HHH actuallly does a complete and correct
>>>>> emulation, or the behavior DDD (but not the emulation of DDD by HHH)
>>>>> will reach that return.
>>>>>
>>>> A complete emulation of a non-terminating input has always been a
>>>> contradiction in terms.
>>>> HHH correctly predicts that a correct and unlimited emulation of DDD
>>>> by HHH cannot possibly reach its own "return" instruction final halt
>>>> state.
>>>
>>> That is not a meaningful prediction because a complete and unlimited
>>> emulation of DDD by HHH never happens.
>>>
>> A complete emulation is not required to correctly predict that a
>> complete emulation would never halt.
> What do we care about a complete simulation? HHH isn't doing one.
> 

Please go read how Mike corrected you.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer