| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v9jgol$l633$7@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity? Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 00:05:41 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 7 Message-ID: <v9jgol$l633$7@dont-email.me> References: <v9fs3i$3u15q$3@dont-email.me> <v9gq6g$452q$1@dont-email.me> <v9h12t$55of$1@dont-email.me> <v9jgao$la41$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 02:05:41 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d7cae053e9df3f883db63e1b357d182b"; logging-data="694371"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18IFSvUEiI2YVhmtPlcqB00" User-Agent: Pan/0.159 (Vovchansk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:GrcJoVvFWuV2P44sGoE8fvmpe2E= On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 19:58:16 -0400, Stephen Hoffman wrote: > Defaulting to an open relay is just spectacularly stupid. Back in the 1990s, as the spam problem was just gathering steam, there were some old-school sysadmins who vehemently insisted on their right to continue maintaining open mail relays.