Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Space-time interval (2)
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 11:42:17 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <v9kigc$tomj$1@dont-email.me>
References: <YqTjbAPdSf8P-veYFHQCI8eskLU@jntp> <v9dmer$3dtvr$3@dont-email.me>
 <3lzcd1NKCT13xkV8yvlh8oaa3Mg@jntp> <v9fdeg$3rh2a$1@dont-email.me>
 <jBxUcP6BzIhx3lL1WyQctHmm7jo@jntp> <v9g6ij$3vsfg$1@dont-email.me>
 <AVa827R_LOez7mc5Ad3CT6GyhiA@jntp>
 <327c4ebc77dc16239ac38f00b508451b@www.novabbs.com>
 <sqw3zTfcSZX8ZFqoADa2xq0VXC4@jntp> <v9j1v6$j43n$1@dont-email.me>
 <fiviHpp7rdD7izFLGocOvYqUnV8@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 11:41:33 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="77af041fb089df128c38b356cbe2f58e";
	logging-data="975571"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18DabLXiIw0nfYBhfjXLWcB"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:I8lBUw7pFkJsi//EN10+c2Rdhs8=
In-Reply-To: <fiviHpp7rdD7izFLGocOvYqUnV8@jntp>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2890

Den 14.08.2024 22:27, skrev Richard Hachel:
> Le 14/08/2024 à 21:53, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
>> Den 14.08.2024 00:42, skrev Richard Hachel:
> 
>> The point is:
>> Universal time and synchronous clocks have been used for centuries!

The FACT is that synchronous clocks have been used for centuries.


>> And you claim that clock's in Oslo and Paris can't be synchronous!
>> In 2024!

|> Den 22.07.2024 21:37, skrev Paul.B.Andersen:
|>>
|>> You know of course that all clocks in the same time zone
|>> are synchronous. In France and Norway clocks are currently
|>> showing GMT + 2 hour, so my clock and your clock are actually
|>> synchronous.
|>>
|>> Please explain why our clocks are NOT synchronous.
|>> (To within few seconds|
|

|> Den 22.07.2024 23:55, Richard Hachel responded:>
|>> But I keep explaining it to you.
|>>
|>> This is a property of space that can be called universal anisochrony.
|>>
|>> This does not translate into the idea that the “plan of present time”
|>> so dear to physicists does not exist, it is a thought that seems
|>> logical to them, but it is an abstract thought.
|>>

Since you claim that clocks can't be synchronous,
and synchronous clocks are used for centuries
YOU ARE WRONG WHEN YOU CLAIM THAT CLOCKS CAN'T BE SYNCHRONISED.

> 
> But that's not what I'm talking about!!!
> 
> Oh, my God, my God!!!
> 
> THAT'S NOT WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT!!!
> 

So what are you talking about?
That clocks can be synchronised?

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/