Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v9l6kj$10ae5$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Proof that DDD specifies non-halting behavior --- point by point Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 10:25:07 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 41 Message-ID: <v9l6kj$10ae5$4@dont-email.me> References: <v9gv4k$4sc4$1@dont-email.me> <v9hp66$ck4s$1@dont-email.me> <v9ia4j$f16v$1@dont-email.me> <v9kkso$u2rh$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 17:25:08 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b70e3e79cdddcca7f32bbdda15810b8e"; logging-data="1059269"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/gWFwmTSEfZCP2W2j50m29" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:SXAYnWsZlHHkYvJyPeeuHUJrMNA= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <v9kkso$u2rh$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2474 On 8/15/2024 5:22 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-08-14 13:06:27 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 8/14/2024 3:17 AM, Mikko wrote: >>> On 2024-08-14 00:52:36 +0000, olcott said: >>> >>>> void DDD() >>>> { >>>> HHH(DDD); >>>> return; >>>> } >>> >>> In order to prove that the above specifies a non-halting behavour >>> you must prove that HHH(DDD) does not terminate. >> >> Wrong. > > At least the proof that DDD does not terminate also proves as an > intermedate result or an obvious corollary that HHH does not halt. > > Non-halting means that an infinite number of instructions can be > executed without halting. That means that at least one instruction > is executed infinitely many times as there are only finitely many > instructions. But not instrunctions of DDD outside HHH is executed > infinitely many times. > Wrong. Non-halting only means that when DDD is emulated according to the semantics of the x86 language and this emulation is unlimited that DDD would never reach its own "return" instruction. HHH need not do this unlimited emulation to correctly predict the behavior of an unlimited emulation. It a form of mathematical induction adapted for use with execution traces. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer