Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v9m7s8$159b1$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: Pearls Before Swine: Rat The Luddite Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 17:52:27 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 80 Message-ID: <v9m7s8$159b1$1@dont-email.me> References: <v8s4e1$1bfga$2@dont-email.me> <v8s8j4$1cbov$1@dont-email.me> <nr24bjdet72ak69sfl5063e5adslm32o4u@4ax.com> <h4h4bjhl38jiaglplpggml4nhtt89odnpp@4ax.com> <slrnvb4nj4.tcg.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <lhh8r6Fik7sU1@mid.individual.net> <v903q8$35ehe$1@dont-email.me> <tov9bj99r02h5e0n9h4b1u1392uvjk2mlf@4ax.com> <fe8tO.291927$a6n5.15337@fx15.iad> <17fobjtemh0r464olg57kk4b5j8ol72v3u@4ax.com> <dtipbjtb6qehenc07d2025ks9od0798lfu@4ax.com> <TH4vO.27471$yI05.15120@fx38.iad> <v9imto$h57c$1@dont-email.me> <v9jko8$lr5i$2@dont-email.me> <v9lcji$11bu6$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 02:52:25 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="45f5c741d2e3f53c88b3a5263e2973a5"; logging-data="1221985"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/PY2cE161qyyaQ1TQz0nEV" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:T12x1l6ghszbcUXPvxNFXznRui4= In-Reply-To: <v9lcji$11bu6$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 4798 On 8/15/2024 10:06 AM, Cryptoengineer wrote: > On 8/14/2024 9:13 PM, Dimensional Traveler wrote: >> On 8/14/2024 9:44 AM, Cryptoengineer wrote: >>> On 8/14/2024 12:12 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote: >>>> Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> writes: >>>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 22:15:25 -0700, The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 08 Aug 2024 18:35:55 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The only solution is to completely eliminate single-use >>>>>>> plastics. I'd even go so far as to include milk and >>>>>>> juice jugs in that ban (glass is far more recyclable >>>>>>> and aside shipping weight, similar in cost). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Paper milk cartons can eliminate the plastic lid. >>>>>> >>>>>> What does "single use" mean? I understand in the context of fast food >>>>>> cups but how about less common items like those 4 liter milk jugs I >>>> >>>> As noted below, I explicitly included 4liter/1gallon milk jugs. >>>> >>>>>> get my milk in (and generally put out each week in the recycling bin) >>>>>> or similar such items - for instance my cheddar comes wrapped in >>>>>> plastic and once the cheese is eaten, that plastic wrapper isn't >>>>>> getting used again <grin> >>> >>> Congratulations. Your jugs join the 9% of plastic that gets recycled >>> in America. >>> >>> 91% goes to the landfill or incinerator. >>> >>> [...] >>>>> >>>>> There is a /reason/ we replaced glass with plastic, at least in some >>>>> cases. >>>> >>>> The primary reason is shipping weight. >>> >>> I'd challenge that: The primary reason is money. >>> >>> Yes, lower shipping weight saves money, but I expect >>> much larger is the savings from not having to maintain >>> a recycling chain to recover, wash, and reuse bottles >>> strong enough to sustain multiple uses (you may remember >>> what old school Coke bottles were like). >>> >>> I've seen one gallon glass milk jugs, but they're heavy >>> enough to need included handles. More often I've seen >>> milk delivery using pint bottles - multiple if the family >>> requests it. >>> >>>>> Interestingly, while, until they were banned, one-time-use plastic >>>>> shopping bags were taxed (as were and still are papter one-time-use >>>>> paper bags), smaller bags used to contain fruits and veggies were >>>>> exempt, despite clearly being one-time-use. >>>> >>>> The Trader Joes produce bags are biodegradable. >>> >>> Single use plastic shopping bags are an interesting case of >>> tradeoffs. Banning them absolutely cuts down on unsightly >>> trash blowing around, but I've read that the 'resusable' bags >>> sold to replace them are so much heavier that they need to >>> be used hundreds of times before they pay off the extra >>> plastic used. >>> >> I use cloth bags.... > > What cloth? Is it a natural fiber? Or is it polyester/dacron, etc? > > If its a plastic fiber, you've done little or nothing to reduce > plastic waste. How many single-use bags are required to equal the > weight of your reusable? > Less than the number of years I've been using them. -- I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky dirty old man.