| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v9nbq8$1d2us$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Python <python@invalid.org> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Sync two clocks Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 13:05:44 +0200 Organization: CCCP Lines: 58 Message-ID: <v9nbq8$1d2us$2@dont-email.me> References: <u18wy1Hl3tOo1DpOF6WVSF0s-08@jntp> <v9nant$1d2us$1@dont-email.me> <17ec3040cf2f4e8f$429420$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 13:05:44 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f0a1718a6064f876666053abb2f39a69"; logging-data="1477596"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+364PbU3rT7Kc6YGBh/RDT" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:sGjrP+QwYXF5r9DL8+LyoBA/XRk= In-Reply-To: <17ec3040cf2f4e8f$429420$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3218 Le 16/08/2024 à 12:56, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > W dniu 16.08.2024 o 12:47, Python pisze: >> Le 15/08/2024 à 21:38, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit : >>> >>> The notion of universal anisochrony means that each watch will lag >>> behind the other with an anisochrony Et=x/c, a reciprocal phenomenon >>> that will affect all the watches in the universe. >>> >>>> How naive is it possible to be? >>> >>>> You don't sync two clocks to each other, you sync one clock >>> to another clock. >>> >>> You still don't understand. >> >> You completely messed up your quotes above. Anyway... >> >> You're probably a bit intellectually challenged to understand a >> procedure that is fairly simple, just as you were in 2007 when you >> miserably demonstrated it back then: >> >> https://groups.google.com/g/fr.sci.physique/c/KgqI9gqTkR8/m/oMc9X0XjCWMJ >> >> If the meaning of t_A, t_B, and t'_A are still unknown to you, you can >> refer to Einstein 1905 article. >> >> t_A is the time shown by clock A when a light signal is emitted; >> >> t_B is the time shown by clock B when the signal is received and >> re-emitted; >> >> t'_A is the time shown by clock A when the returned signal is received. >> >> Given that your stubbornness in not wanting to understand what you don't >> get at the first reading is even stronger than your stupidity (which is >> saying something!), I doubt you'll even try to comprehend. However, here >> are a few intermediate exercises to help you understand what most people >> grasp on the first try: >> >> 1. Using the hypothesis (confirmed by experiment) that: > > A lie,[snip whining] - > the hypothesis was no way confirmed. A Review of One-Way and Two-Way Experiments to Test the Isotropy of the Speed of Light Md. Farid Ahmed, Brendan M. Quine, Stoyan Sargoytchev, A. D. Stauffer https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.1318 > But it was a self-denying absurd instead. Because you say so? Unfortunately there is nothing absurd into light speed two-way experiments to confirm it to be invariant.