Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Sync two clocks
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 14:08:33 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 84
Message-ID: <v9nfg1$1d2us$4@dont-email.me>
References: <u18wy1Hl3tOo1DpOF6WVSF0s-08@jntp> <v9nant$1d2us$1@dont-email.me>
 <17ec3040cf2f4e8f$429420$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <v9nbq8$1d2us$2@dont-email.me>
 <17ec3405e4af90ba$368247$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 14:08:35 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f0a1718a6064f876666053abb2f39a69";
	logging-data="1477596"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+0/2hxHFTL3hxs7lwYbGrg"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:F0tY3aBq1yHUan5x73jmI4qjdl8=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <17ec3405e4af90ba$368247$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4037

Le 16/08/2024 à 14:05, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 16.08.2024 o 13:05, Python pisze:
>> Le 16/08/2024 à 12:56, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>> W dniu 16.08.2024 o 12:47, Python pisze:
>>>> Le 15/08/2024 à 21:38, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> The notion of universal anisochrony means that each watch will lag 
>>>>> behind the other with an anisochrony Et=x/c, a reciprocal 
>>>>> phenomenon that will affect all the watches in the universe.
>>>>>
>>>>>> How naive is it possible to be?
>>>>>
>>>>>> You don't sync two clocks to each other, you sync one clock
>>>>> to another clock.
>>>>>
>>>>> You still don't understand.
>>>>
>>>> You completely messed up your quotes above. Anyway...
>>>>
>>>> You're probably a bit intellectually challenged to understand a
>>>> procedure that is fairly simple, just as you were in 2007 when you
>>>> miserably demonstrated it back then:
>>>>
>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/fr.sci.physique/c/KgqI9gqTkR8/m/oMc9X0XjCWMJ
>>>>
>>>> If the meaning of t_A, t_B, and t'_A are still unknown to you, you can
>>>> refer to Einstein 1905 article.
>>>>
>>>> t_A is the time shown by clock A when a light signal is emitted;
>>>>
>>>> t_B is the time shown by clock B when the signal is received and 
>>>> re-emitted;
>>>>
>>>> t'_A is the time shown by clock A when the returned signal is received.
>>>>
>>>> Given that your stubbornness in not wanting to understand what you 
>>>> don't
>>>> get at the first reading is even stronger than your stupidity (which is
>>>> saying something!), I doubt you'll even try to comprehend. However, 
>>>> here
>>>> are a few intermediate exercises to help you understand what most 
>>>> people
>>>> grasp on the first try:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Using the hypothesis (confirmed by experiment) that:
>>>
>>> A lie,[snip whining]  -
>>> the hypothesis was no way confirmed.
>>
>> A Review of One-Way and Two-Way Experiments to Test the Isotropy of 
>> the Speed of Light
>>
>> Md. Farid Ahmed, Brendan M. Quine, Stoyan Sargoytchev, A. D. Stauffer
>>
>> https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.1318
> 
> I could as well write those  experiments
> are testing and confirming the advantage
> of communism over rotten capitalism. But
> they don't.
> 
> 
>>
>>>  But it was a self-denying absurd instead.
>>
>> Because you say so? 
> 
> Because that's a VERY simple consequence
> of a definition, in the time you're talking
> about - in the time when your idiot guru
> lived and mumbled - valid also for his
> moronic church.
> 
> 
> Unfortunately there is nothing absurd into light
>> speed two-way experiments to confirm it to be invariant.
> 
> Oh, yes, it is. You're an idiot, so
> you're unable to notice.

So all you have is incoherent babbling and insults, as usual.