Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v9ntpl$1g6ln$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 11:12:37 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 81
Message-ID: <v9ntpl$1g6ln$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me>
 <8318f5969aa3074e542747fe6ba2916d7f599bde@i2pn2.org>
 <TyKdnc3hCNvmUyf7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <v9ekta$3necg$1@dont-email.me>
 <2f8c1b0943d03743fe9894937092bc2832e0a029@i2pn2.org>
 <v9fn50$3ta4u$2@dont-email.me> <v9hmfc$c71c$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9ic89$f16v$6@dont-email.me>
 <06ea0f3a1ff938643b3dfefdf62af15559593733@i2pn2.org>
 <v9iqgc$go4j$2@dont-email.me>
 <LcucnRYb5ZiYhyD7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <v9j6ci$jo32$1@dont-email.me> <v9kdp9$srkm$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9ku3k$v95g$1@dont-email.me> <v9nbqr$1dmui$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9nf3o$1dvef$3@dont-email.me> <v9nkhd$1ertd$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9nmj5$1f34m$1@dont-email.me>
 <6590517a070695b81751db1b64c3d26019ee9b13@i2pn2.org>
 <v9nog5$1fe76$1@dont-email.me>
 <0a080ae812729bc25f3c2dab98bb4d9dfac6641d@i2pn2.org>
 <v9npsa$1flup$1@dont-email.me>
 <b2d424392298da7dc7b6c6937f18329f277fcde7@i2pn2.org>
 <v9ns6p$1fvsr$1@dont-email.me>
 <0b16013ea170d361a72f11d7cf046bd836b7aea6@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 18:12:38 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0832828dca420f70d701da47ce3141da";
	logging-data="1579703"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ojP2r8i2OEUyd/84aEE4I"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MrnuIJUdWSZDDEs1cUEDn22TSB0=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <0b16013ea170d361a72f11d7cf046bd836b7aea6@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 4732

On 8/16/2024 11:00 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 8/16/24 11:45 AM, olcott wrote:
>> On 8/16/2024 10:39 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 8/16/24 11:05 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 8/16/2024 9:56 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 8/16/24 10:42 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/16/2024 9:28 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/16/24 10:09 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2024 8:34 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2024-08-16 12:02:00 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I must go one step at a time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's reasonable in a discussion. The one thing you were 
>>>>>>>>> discussing
>>>>>>>>> above is what is the meaning of the output of HHH. Its OK to stay
>>>>>>>>> at that step until we are sure it is understood.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> void DDD()
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>    HHH(DDD);
>>>>>>>>    return;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Unless an unlimited emulation of DDD by HHH
>>>>>>>> can reach the "return" instruction of DDD it is
>>>>>>>> construed that this instance of DDD never halts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But that also construes that HHH is a program that DOES an 
>>>>>>> unlimited emulation of DDD, and thus isn't a decider
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not at all. never has.
>>>>>> HHH must predict what the behavior of an unlimited
>>>>>> simulation would be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Right, unlimited emulation of the EXACT input that HHH got, that is 
>>>>> the DDD that calls the HHH that is the decider
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PREDICT WHAT THE BEHAVIOR WOULD BE
>>>> PREDICT WHAT THE BEHAVIOR WOULD BE
>>>> PREDICT WHAT THE BEHAVIOR WOULD BE
>>>> PREDICT WHAT THE BEHAVIOR WOULD BE
>>>>
>>>> IF IT WAS AN UNLIMITED EMULATION
>>>> IF IT WAS AN UNLIMITED EMULATION
>>>> IF IT WAS AN UNLIMITED EMULATION
>>>> IF IT WAS AN UNLIMITED EMULATION
>>>>
>>>
>>> So, I guess you aren't working on the Halting Problem, 
>>
>> Halt deciders have always been required to predict what the
>> behavior of their input would be.
>>
> 
> Right, and the input to the Halt Decider HHH is the DDD that calls the 
> Halt Decider HHH, not the DDD that calls the unlimited emulator HHH.
> 

You can't get away with disagreeing with the semantics
of the x86 language.

_DDD()
[00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d         pop ebp
[00002183] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer