Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 12:11:30 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <v9o183$1gkn7$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me>
 <d289636b1d244acaf00108f46df093a9fd5aa27c@i2pn2.org>
 <v9dk2j$3dp9h$1@dont-email.me>
 <8318f5969aa3074e542747fe6ba2916d7f599bde@i2pn2.org>
 <TyKdnc3hCNvmUyf7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <v9ekta$3necg$1@dont-email.me>
 <2f8c1b0943d03743fe9894937092bc2832e0a029@i2pn2.org>
 <v9fn50$3ta4u$2@dont-email.me> <v9hmfc$c71c$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9ic89$f16v$6@dont-email.me>
 <06ea0f3a1ff938643b3dfefdf62af15559593733@i2pn2.org>
 <v9iqgc$go4j$2@dont-email.me>
 <LcucnRYb5ZiYhyD7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <v9j6ci$jo32$1@dont-email.me> <v9kdp9$srkm$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9ku3k$v95g$1@dont-email.me> <v9nbqr$1dmui$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9nf3o$1dvef$3@dont-email.me> <v9nkhd$1ertd$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9nmj5$1f34m$1@dont-email.me>
 <6590517a070695b81751db1b64c3d26019ee9b13@i2pn2.org>
 <v9nog5$1fe76$1@dont-email.me>
 <34a22fd138e2e1e41a4dd29cd6c9016064e2343c@i2pn2.org>
 <v9npus$1flup$2@dont-email.me>
 <e9c7ddb8dc4b4b03399d064d634f11297501e49d@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 19:11:31 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0832828dca420f70d701da47ce3141da";
	logging-data="1594087"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18kR4QAeCmirU3lKkPdtl14"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y1pSYCWKEbYZWPUCjS9Lch//j00=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <e9c7ddb8dc4b4b03399d064d634f11297501e49d@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 3421

On 8/16/2024 11:47 AM, joes wrote:
> Am Fri, 16 Aug 2024 10:07:08 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>> On 8/16/2024 9:59 AM, joes wrote:
>>> Am Fri, 16 Aug 2024 09:42:13 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>> On 8/16/2024 9:28 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 8/16/24 10:09 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/16/2024 8:34 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-08-16 12:02:00 +0000, olcott said:
>>>
>>>>>> Unless an unlimited emulation of DDD by HHH can reach the "return"
>>>>>> instruction of DDD it is construed that this instance of DDD never
>>>>>> halts.
>>>>> But that also construes that HHH is a program that DOES an unlimited
>>>>> emulation of DDD, and thus isn't a decider
>>>> Not at all. never has.
>>> Yes, because DDD is defined to call its simulator. If you change the
>>> simulator to abort, you also change the simulated HHH. Nobody cares
>>> about HHH aborting a pure simulator.
> 
>>>> HHH must predict what the behavior of an unlimited simulation would
>>>> be.
>>> The HHH that aborts must predict what DDD calling an aborting HHH does
>> NOT AT ALL, NEVER HAS.
>> PREDICT WHAT THE BEHAVIOR WOULD BE
>> IF IT WAS AN UNLIMITED EMULATION
> Yes, an unlimited simulation of an aborting HHH. 

Prediction of behavior of unlimited emulation
means prediction of behavior that never aborts.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer