Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Mike's correction of Joes correct Fred too
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 13:50:10 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 86
Message-ID: <v9o712$1h5u4$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v9gv4k$4sc4$1@dont-email.me>
 <561f876601b0329c0260bac26f8b6dfb6e28647f@i2pn2.org>
 <v9h5af$9jn6$1@dont-email.me>
 <bdfcf881b9a9ce7e2bc197339d14a01beae1116d@i2pn2.org>
 <XYucnXqdgeWiVSH7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <b8a96bbfe0516cf99b6f38c23fb4eccc3810ee7e@i2pn2.org>
 <v9krc5$uqhs$1@dont-email.me> <v9l7hf$vao1$3@dont-email.me>
 <v9laed$113gd$2@dont-email.me>
 <EbecnaOe1ajC1yP7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <v9llh9$12l6c$2@dont-email.me> <v9mt9h$1bdeu$3@dont-email.me>
 <v9nev6$1dvef$2@dont-email.me>
 <TqucndEmmvrpASL7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 20:50:10 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0832828dca420f70d701da47ce3141da";
	logging-data="1611716"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+q+IWfzhTNGrTNnUY3Eemw"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WK4C8rUcVXDzpY6+x0JqtJErFrE=
In-Reply-To: <TqucndEmmvrpASL7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4570

On 8/16/2024 1:37 PM, Mike Terry wrote:
> On 16/08/2024 12:59, olcott wrote:
>> On 8/16/2024 1:57 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 15.aug.2024 om 21:39 schreef olcott:
>>>
>>> It is clear that olcott does not really read what I write. (Or is 
>>> very short of memory.)
>>> I never said such a thing.
>>> I repeatedly told that the 
>>
>> *YOUR MISTAKE*
>>> simulating HHH aborted when the simulated HHH had only one cycle to go.
>> That is WRONG. The outermost directly executed HHH aborts
>> as soon as it has seen enough of the emulated execution
>> trace to correctly predict that an unlimited execution
>> would never stop running.
>>
>> *With abort as soon as you know*
>> *there is never one more cycle to go*
>>
>> *MIKES CORRECTION OF YOUR MISTAKE*
>> On 8/14/2024 10:07 AM, Mike Terry wrote:
>>  > On 14/08/2024 08:43, joes wrote:
>>  >> HHH simulates DDD    enter the matrix
>>  >>    DDD calls HHH(DDD)    Fred: could be eliminated
>>  >>    HHH simulates DDD    second level
>>  >>      DDD calls HHH(DDD)    recursion detected
>>  >>    HHH aborts, returns    outside interference
>>  >>    DDD halts        voila
>>  >> HHH halts
>>  >
>>  > You're misunderstanding the scenario?  If your simulated
>>  > HHH aborts its simulation [line 5 above],
>>
>> *THIS PART RIGHT HERE*
>>  > then the outer level H would have aborted its
>>  > identical simulation earlier. You know that, right?
>>
>>  > [It's what people have been discussing
>>  > here endlessly for the last few months! :) ]
>>  >
>>  > So your trace is impossible...
>>  >
> 
> I supposed that I should be annoyed that you deliberately ignore my 
> request to stop misrepresting my views and opinions.  You /know/ I don't 
> agree with how you're misusing my words - but you do it anyway.
> 

Both Joes and Fred seem to think that every HHH can wait for
the next one to abort and one of them will still eventually
abort.

Please try and explain to me exactly how your words did
not correct this error.

If you keep insisting that I am wrong and fail to explain all
of the details of how I am wrong I will continue to assume that
it is your error of not paying close enough attention.


> But the fact that even with a direct warning that you are 
> misunderstanding, you still go ahead and repeat your nonsense in the end 
> just becomes FUNNY.  :)
> 
> Of course, nothing I said above supports your claims for what it is 
> saying.  I could challenge you to justify your claims, but that would 
> just waste everybody's time.  You are just intellectually incapable of 
> discussing this topic.  (Not your "fault", you're not being lazy or 
> anything, it's just how your brain is wired.)
> 
> 
> Mike.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer