Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v9ob6u$sph$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: yes!
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 16:01:33 -0400
Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <v9ob6u$sph$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References: <2ugqbjhvlh9vrlmqhciaubcf64dbooph0o@4ax.com> <v9lp74$13417$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 20:01:34 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com;
	logging-data="29489"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qvpeafBcbPueAtOLPLYFBuaOjMo= sha256:wOdsmecSYtjNNT1rC2ZXcxMrxnOfsnlRg6GXihqu6Fc=
	sha1:RTaNBqOrnwBiu81MorQu9X7m5HU= sha256:omG6ch5Jin2d9djQtuLhQMkRgkB0P6QNwnbUopiFVBU=
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Bytes: 3077

"Martin Brown" <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote in message news:v9lp74$13417$1@dont-email.me...
> On 15/08/2024 00:55, john larkin wrote:
>>
>> https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a61854962/quantum-entanglement-consciousness/
>
> Popular Mechanics is *such* a reputable source of cutting edge QM theory.
>
> When they publish it in Nature or somewhere reputable I'll take note.
> They already seem to have grumbled to New Scientist about being dissed.
>
> A hypothesis has to survive experimental testing to be at all credible. If they are right then you should be able to alter 
> consciousness by flooding the interior of the brain with incoherent IR photons. Somehow I can't see that working at all.
>
> Quantum entanglement may be all the rage now but it is likely to be just another variant of the "action at a distance" in 
> Newtonian gravity that will disappear once we have a complete grand unified theory of physics.
>
> So far it looks like consciousness is an emergent property of any sufficiently complex computational network. The big super 
> computer networks are now getting close to the threshold where that might happen.

I can remember when this guy told us why we couldn't do it back then.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kE4QZ1PYiGk
Jump to 49:12
But that was then.

>
> Human brains and octopus distributed leg processing are wired entirely
> differently but both show high intelligence and self awareness.
>
> https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/octopuses-keep-surprising-us-here-are-eight-examples-how.html
>
> Some octopuses in research captivity also have a wicked sense of humour throwing slightly dodgy fish back at their keepers and/or 
> escaping with monotonous regularity. A bit like parrots except they can't mimic talk (or bite through mains cables, windscreen 
> wipers and paint tin lids).
>
> -- 
> Martin Brown
>