Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v9q8uo$1tjt4$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Python <python@invalid.org> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Sync two clocks Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 15:35:20 +0200 Organization: CCCP Lines: 39 Message-ID: <v9q8uo$1tjt4$6@dont-email.me> References: <u18wy1Hl3tOo1DpOF6WVSF0s-08@jntp> <v9nant$1d2us$1@dont-email.me> <vPP1Z1BJfE1Dt7SYhCzEo7ZQWFI@jntp> <v9pmsf$1rgi3$1@dont-email.me> <EadudY-_mtVd5Pzei90AAEM8Cqk@jntp> <ef652e4f1a223f067bc90a0ceffe296b@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 15:35:20 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ea4b9eeca68ae5a2045bb23a53d7dd95"; logging-data="2019236"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18P6HE1Nlnt11ehNaOf+RsA" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Zl291mZ+Wc9JcaNLTWzTJEBI2cE= In-Reply-To: <ef652e4f1a223f067bc90a0ceffe296b@www.novabbs.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2342 Le 17/08/2024 à 15:19, gharnagel a écrit : > On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 8:56:06 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote: >> >> Le 17/08/2024 à 10:26, Mikko a écrit : >> > >> > Richard Hachel wrote: >> > > >> > > FOR A: >> > > tB-t1=2AB/c >> > > t2-tB=0 >> > > >> > > FOR B: >> > > tB-t1=0 >> > > t2-tB=2AB/c >> > >> > t1, t2, tB, AB, c, and 0 are numbers. Numbers are the same for >> > everyone, including A and B, and therefore the realtions between >> > the numbers are the same, too. >> > >> > Mikko >> >> No, the numbers are not the same for everyone. >> Let's take the case of the Langevin traveler, Vo=0.8c. D=2*12al. > > Richard, it seems to me that you're conflating two different > situations, which causes monumental confusion. The case that > was under discussion was synchronizing two clocks at rest with > respect to each other, not the case where the clocks are in > relative motion, n'est-ce pas? It is even worse than that: he conflates the reading of a *single* clock at a single event with the readings of two clocks. He is basically claiming that for some observers 3 can be 4. He is highly demented.