Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v9qneu$1tedb$26@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 12:42:54 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 77 Message-ID: <v9qneu$1tedb$26@dont-email.me> References: <v9q52r$1tedb$1@dont-email.me> <867e1149d7291cfd965b6974aa22f104635f38aa@i2pn2.org> <v9qdre$1tedb$11@dont-email.me> <d0755e4d97f2c3caebf57ebc856ed8078be3c7dd@i2pn2.org> <v9qeed$1tedb$12@dont-email.me> <116cb41843f55511cf8fa5c2216083136e50c976@i2pn2.org> <v9qg05$1tedb$14@dont-email.me> <b8d7322ff586ee2776ced1a09090df787d889791@i2pn2.org> <v9qmci$1tedb$23@dont-email.me> <624e9a80190b25bac34b8e9ddf095ae1c4aa65d6@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 19:42:54 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5c4a0c817977c3965e873c4f304e2b88"; logging-data="2013611"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+vowyrPs641StqM+dzg3DK" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:fBfvqFw2jPF4Nd26E6UP3rYhlfE= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <624e9a80190b25bac34b8e9ddf095ae1c4aa65d6@i2pn2.org> Bytes: 4171 On 8/17/2024 12:36 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 8/17/24 1:24 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 8/17/2024 11:16 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> On 8/17/24 11:35 AM, olcott wrote: >>>> On 8/17/2024 10:30 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>> On 8/17/24 11:09 AM, olcott wrote: >>>>>> On 8/17/2024 10:06 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/17/24 10:58 AM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>> On 8/17/2024 9:10 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 8/17/24 8:29 AM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>> void DDD() >>>>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>>>> HHH(DDD); >>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _DDD() >>>>>>>>>> [00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>>>>>>>>> [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>>>>>>>>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD >>>>>>>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD) >>>>>>>>>> [0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>>>>>>>>> [00002182] 5d pop ebp >>>>>>>>>> [00002183] c3 ret >>>>>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *It is a basic fact that DDD emulated by HHH according to* >>>>>>>>>> *the semantics of the x86 language cannot possibly stop* >>>>>>>>>> *running unless aborted* (out of memory error excluded) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No, anyone saying that the above is something that CAN be >>>>>>>>> correctly emulated by the semantics of the x86 language is just >>>>>>>>> a LIAR. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are inserting a word that I did not say. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To say that DDD is emulated by HHH means that it must be possible >>>>>>> to validly do that act. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You are not going to get very far with any claim that >>>>>> emulating a sequence of x86 machine-code bytes is impossible. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> How do you emulate dthe CALL HHH instruction without the code that >>>>> follows? >>>>> >>>>> Who is the silly one now? >>>>> >>>> >>>> No it has moved up to a ridiculous and utterly >>>> baseless false assumption that is directly contradicted >>>> by the verified fact that x86utm takes Halt7.obj as >>>> its input data, thus having all of the machine code >>>> of HHH directly available to DDD. >>>> >>> >>> And thus, ALL of memory is the "input" and thus any change in it >>> renders that answer possibly different. >>> >> >> There are no other words that can be added to my >> words that change the immutable fact of my words. >> > > Which are just meaningless garbage and a LIE. > > The DDD given can not be "emulated" by HHH, *just meaningless garbage and a LIE* -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer