Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Anyone that claims this is not telling the truth
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 16:05:35 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 83
Message-ID: <v9r3av$1tedb$38@dont-email.me>
References: <v9q52r$1tedb$1@dont-email.me>
 <867e1149d7291cfd965b6974aa22f104635f38aa@i2pn2.org>
 <v9qdre$1tedb$11@dont-email.me>
 <d0755e4d97f2c3caebf57ebc856ed8078be3c7dd@i2pn2.org>
 <v9qeed$1tedb$12@dont-email.me>
 <116cb41843f55511cf8fa5c2216083136e50c976@i2pn2.org>
 <v9qg05$1tedb$14@dont-email.me>
 <b8d7322ff586ee2776ced1a09090df787d889791@i2pn2.org>
 <v9qmci$1tedb$23@dont-email.me>
 <624e9a80190b25bac34b8e9ddf095ae1c4aa65d6@i2pn2.org>
 <v9qneu$1tedb$26@dont-email.me>
 <5aeaac6d89bca36e2e2564a2e60b6ed346839aab@i2pn2.org>
 <v9qp4p$1tedb$29@dont-email.me>
 <f742232fdc754b4d1998fbe57d4cbc8b6d07579d@i2pn2.org>
 <v9qqpj$1tedb$31@dont-email.me>
 <b1c1fc46c760d4764d3d1c529b4ae89b34ce69f5@i2pn2.org>
 <v9qs0r$1tedb$32@dont-email.me>
 <c123b309a16a59970eda679a6d381a220999c0d2@i2pn2.org>
 <v9r04b$1tedb$35@dont-email.me>
 <194ac945e5d201e9e82279156a4cd93bf55dcb1c@i2pn2.org>
 <v9r1u2$1tedb$36@dont-email.me>
 <3fd8b24c808a19e3669680c81bf4272902a7cc7a@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 23:05:36 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5c4a0c817977c3965e873c4f304e2b88";
	logging-data="2013611"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18+msESVTnAZ41fUddysYV3"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JYNQn6OV2KSFd+hYkogI8B8Xk3M=
In-Reply-To: <3fd8b24c808a19e3669680c81bf4272902a7cc7a@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4793

On 8/17/2024 4:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 8/17/24 4:41 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 8/17/2024 3:20 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 8/17/24 4:10 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 8/17/2024 2:27 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>  > On 8/17/24 3:00 PM, olcott wrote:>> On 8/17/2024 1:50 PM, Richard 
>>>> Damon wrote:
>>>>  >>>>>> And thus ALL of memory is part of the input,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any additional details have no effect what-so-ever on my claim.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Suure it does.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since your argument tries to say that since DDD is the same to all 
>>>>> of them, so its the behavior.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are just admitting to being a LIAR.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Calling me a liar admits that insults is all that you have*
>>>> *If I made a mistake then show that*
>>>
>>> I did.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> FOR THREE YEARS YOU ALWAYS CHEAT
>>>> BY CHANGING MY WORDS AND REBUTTING THESE CHANGED WORDS
>>>>
>>>> *Everything that is not expressly stated below is*
>>>> *specified as unspecified*
>>>
>>> Ok.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> void DDD()
>>>> {
>>>>    HHH(DDD);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> _DDD()
>>>> [00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002173] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
>>>> [0000217f] 83c404     add esp,+04
>>>> [00002182] 5d         pop ebp
>>>> [00002183] c3         ret
>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>>>
>>>> *It is a basic fact that DDD emulated by HHH according to*
>>>> *the semantics of the x86 language cannot possibly stop*
>>>> *running unless aborted* (out of memory error excluded)
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, DDD can NOT be emulated accoreding to the semantics of the x86 
>>> langauge, because the contents of the location 000015d2 is not 
>>> provided to be emulated, and will need to be emulated after emulating 
>>> the call instruction.
>>>
>>
>> Everything that is logically entailed by the above specification
>> is included by reference. The assumption that DDD and HHH were
>> not in the same memory space has always been ridiculous.
>>
> 
> Then I guess you accept that every different HHH generates a DIFFERENT 
> Input, as that input, BY LOGHICAL NECESSITY includes all the code of HHH 
> so it can be emulated, and thus you claims that "All the DDDs have the 
> same bytes" is just a blantent lie.
> 

This is my only claim
*It is a basic fact that DDD emulated by HHH according to*
*the semantics of the x86 language cannot possibly stop*
*running unless aborted* (out of memory error excluded)

I am not claiming anything about any bytes.


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer