Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: This makes all Analytic(Olcott) truth computable
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 16:47:00 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 80
Message-ID: <v9r5ok$1tedb$41@dont-email.me>
References: <v86olp$5km4$1@dont-email.me> <v9qgn7$1tedb$15@dont-email.me>
 <6272b80d0aeaca324ac8624dce71945edeb59092@i2pn2.org>
 <v9qjg5$1tedb$17@dont-email.me>
 <2e642af254f6140ce8711da64f31d4fd8467d58b@i2pn2.org>
 <v9qkeb$1tedb$19@dont-email.me>
 <f883e0312dcbce8663eaa445348e225687d83959@i2pn2.org>
 <v9qm86$1tedb$22@dont-email.me>
 <a2c1ed800e02c5e922df63241206c00d855680d5@i2pn2.org>
 <v9qncv$1tedb$25@dont-email.me>
 <2d7efb21a7466aa56ed7be937da998852f6882af@i2pn2.org>
 <v9qon8$1tedb$27@dont-email.me>
 <e452294ec866e3297f9bfec55eff17db4a347a25@i2pn2.org>
 <v9qpju$1tedb$30@dont-email.me>
 <1ec5e64194f4e88998b8d462497e3a378e1d91fd@i2pn2.org>
 <v9qsn9$1tedb$33@dont-email.me>
 <c094e38b272f3522f77a85301391ec1d3ae399a9@i2pn2.org>
 <v9qv6c$1tedb$34@dont-email.me>
 <8afe6c7a528a79eb88aa4754f84d524134d83cc6@i2pn2.org>
 <v9r2nc$1tedb$37@dont-email.me>
 <7b3df4b2e110cce7c51ca2ce0b82b26531030402@i2pn2.org>
 <v9r4dp$1tedb$39@dont-email.me>
 <1b66f6b4e791240d42b21207e2c0eaa9362932b8@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 23:47:00 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5c4a0c817977c3965e873c4f304e2b88";
	logging-data="2013611"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19h4jUtwqFK6EVDutJlpB2+"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RsxgYxUir9XQ9z3hOqM34iGbARI=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <1b66f6b4e791240d42b21207e2c0eaa9362932b8@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 4571

On 8/17/2024 4:33 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 8/17/24 5:24 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 8/17/2024 4:03 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 8/17/24 4:55 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It is more of a somewhat poorly defined process than it is a defined 
>>>> term.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thinks IGNORANT you.
>>>
>>
>> The vast disagreement on very important  truths
>> such as climate change and election denial seems
>> to prove that the notion of truth lacks a process
>> sufficiently well defined that it is accessible
>> to most.
>>
> 
> But has nothing to do with what Philosophy thinks of as truth, but of 
> people being closed minded
> 

The process is not sufficiently well defined such
that divergence from truth smacks people in the face.

>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They are generally a learned-by-rote bunch. Philosophy of
>>>>>> logic delves into this more deeply the problem. The
>>>>>> learned-by-rote bunch assumes that learning by rote makes
>>>>>> them philosophers. They tend to push actual philosophers
>>>>>> out by denigrating them in the philosophy of logic spaces.
>>>>>> Wittgenstein had no patience with them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No, you have your never-learned-because-of-ignorance ideas that are 
>>>>> just incoherent.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It may seem that way from a learned-by-rote the rules-of-logic
>>>> and the "received view" are my gospel frame of reference.
>>>
>>> Thinks IGNORANT YOU.
>>>
>>
>> Wittgenstein said the same thing.
>> Try to name any logician that has any history of
>> being open to critiques of the received view and
>> you will come up empty.
>>
>>>>
>>>>> Your trying to ally with Wittgenstein doesn't really help you, as 
>>>>> his ideas were not always accepted, and considered prone to error, 
>>>>> not unlike your own.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It may seem that way from a learned-by-rote the rules-of-logic
>>>> and the "received view" are my gospel frame of reference.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thinks IGNORANT YOU.
>>>
>>> Your problem is you reject that logic HAS rules that need to be 
>>> followed, 
>>
>> Just like I said a learned-by-rote view.
>> Not any what happens if we change this rule? POV
> 
> Note, I said has rules, and different forms of logic have different 
> rules, something that seems foreign to you.
> 

We change one key rule of logic and then all of the
logical paradoxes suddenly disappear and logic becomes
complete, coherent and consistent.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer