Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v9sa5l$2am2o$1@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v9sa5l$2am2o$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article 
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: key error in all the proofs --- Correction of Fred
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 11:08:21 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <v9sa5l$2am2o$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me> <v9de0o$3cjse$1@dont-email.me> <v9dela$3cjse$2@dont-email.me> <b7c45ea22cb83908c31d909b67f4921156be52e3@i2pn2.org> <v9dgvl$3d1an$1@dont-email.me> <d289636b1d244acaf00108f46df093a9fd5aa27c@i2pn2.org> <v9dk2j$3dp9h$1@dont-email.me> <8318f5969aa3074e542747fe6ba2916d7f599bde@i2pn2.org> <TyKdnc3hCNvmUyf7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <v9ekta$3necg$1@dont-email.me> <2f8c1b0943d03743fe9894937092bc2832e0a029@i2pn2.org> <v9fn50$3ta4u$2@dont-email.me> <v9hmfc$c71c$1@dont-email.me> <v9ic89$f16v$6@dont-email.me> <06ea0f3a1ff938643b3dfefdf62af15559593733@i2pn2.org> <v9iqgc$go4j$2@dont-email.me> <LcucnRYb5ZiYhyD7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <v9j6ci$jo32$1@dont-email.me> <v9kdp9$srkm$1@dont-email.me> <v9ku3k$v95g$1@dont-email.me> <v9nbqr$1dmui$1@dont-email.me> <v9nf3o$1dvef$3@dont-email.me> <v9nkhd$1ertd$1@dont-email.me> <v9nmj5$1f34m$1@dont-email.me> <v9pgpc$1qm46$1@dont-email.me> <v9q9ak$1tedb$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 10:08:22 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4868edd3a7703f25a7649a27b4268f06";
	logging-data="2447448"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+33Vebo+nWJOozv0W3lgRJ"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:R9WsAQuVQNy2sv/Vb2oR4RpdY7M=
Bytes: 3033

On 2024-08-17 13:41:39 +0000, olcott said:

> On 8/17/2024 1:42 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-08-16 14:09:40 +0000, olcott said:
>> 
>>> On 8/16/2024 8:34 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2024-08-16 12:02:00 +0000, olcott said:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I must go one step at a time.
>>>> 
>>>> That's reasonable in a discussion. The one thing you were discussing
>>>> above is what is the meaning of the output of HHH. Its OK to stay
>>>> at that step until we are sure it is understood.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> void DDD()
>>> {
>>>    HHH(DDD);
>>>    return;
>>> }
>>> 
>>> Unless an unlimited emulation of DDD by HHH
>>> can reach the "return" instruction of DDD it is
>>> construed that this instance of DDD never halts.
>> 
>> Whaatever you "construe" does not change the fact that DDD specifies
>> a halting computation if HHH does.
>> 
>>> For three years now at least most reviewers insisted
>>> on disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language.
>> 
>> If you claim that HHH halts and DDD doesn't you disagree with
>> the semantics of both C and x86 languages.
>> 
> 
> Please see my new post.

Which new post? Message ID? Subject? Date and time?

-- 
Mikko