Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v9u5eo$2ivte$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 01:00:08 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: <v9u5eo$2ivte$3@dont-email.me> References: <v9t3ih$2e8ee$1@dont-email.me> <memo.20240818192128.19028F@jgd.cix.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 03:00:09 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ef7435e5787fcab0adf5f487629d6274"; logging-data="2719662"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19kdQ5XYfMq0VcmmjdwTRL+" User-Agent: Pan/0.159 (Vovchansk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Hv2STmGCu1NqyGj36F82JEvxKiU= Bytes: 2159 On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 19:21 +0100 (BST), John Dallman wrote: > In article <v9t3ih$2e8ee$1@dont-email.me>, OrangeFish@invalid.invalid > (OrangeFish) wrote: > >> An interesting comment on the learning curve (and I know nothing about >> COBOL) given the story that the language was created to allow >> non-programmers to programme. > > It doesn't require learning concepts that are strange to accountants or > bookkeepers. Level numbers? “USAGE IS COMPUTATIONAL”? “RESERVE «n» ALTERNATE AREAS”, “ALTER «target» TO PROCEED TO «dest»”? All the fun of the “MOVE” statement? (That’s just off the top of my head; I’m not going to look at any actual COBOL documentation to try to remember more.) Makes you wonder why they didn’t include double-entry bookkeeping as a built-in language primitive: now *that* would have made it more directly relevant to the bean-counter types. Oh, and compound interest requires working with transcendental functions, doesn’t it? Which means worrying about rounding errors. But noooo, that would have been encroaching into “scientific” territory, which was firmly off limits ...