Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: This makes all Analytic(Olcott) truth computable
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 10:59:36 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <v9uu18$2pt1d$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v86olp$5km4$1@dont-email.me> <v8aqh7$11ivs$1@dont-email.me> <v8cr4g$1gk19$1@dont-email.me> <v8dinp$1kii7$1@dont-email.me> <v8hv72$2mmsq$1@dont-email.me> <v8iisj$2qetj$1@dont-email.me> <v8kuhb$3d5q8$1@dont-email.me> <v8lc7p$3f6vr$2@dont-email.me> <v8naa8$3uo7s$1@dont-email.me> <v8nqo7$1n09$1@dont-email.me> <v8sm9o$1gk42$1@dont-email.me> <v8t2fl$1ilg6$2@dont-email.me> <v8v97m$2cofk$1@dont-email.me> <v8vusp$32fso$16@dont-email.me> <v91p95$3ppav$1@dont-email.me> <v92q4f$37e9$1@dont-email.me> <v94l1p$ldq7$1@dont-email.me> <v95c2j$p5rb$4@dont-email.me> <v95cke$p5rb$5@dont-email.me> <v977fo$gsru$1@dont-email.me> <v97goj$ielu$1@dont-email.me> <v9c93e$35sg6$1@dont-email.me> <v9d3k1$3ajip$1@dont-email.me> <v9ffpr$3s45o$1@dont-email.me> <v9fkd4$3se8c$1@dont-email.me> <v9kg66$tdvb$1@dont-email.me> <v9nbjf$1dj8q$1@dont-email.me> <20b1dea98eda49e74e822c96b37565bb3eb36013@i2pn2.org> <v9o4p2$1h5u4$1@dont-email.me> <v9shii$2bmob$1@dont-email.me> <v9sog0$2c67u$8@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:59:36 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3c3cda58ed7c128269c60e73272d160a";
	logging-data="2946093"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/J8ufVjRMna6rptvgYtU3u"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sJEc30OT4YBemk3807WQowJe0I0=
Bytes: 3165

On 2024-08-18 12:12:48 +0000, olcott said:

> On 8/18/2024 5:14 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-08-16 18:11:46 +0000, olcott said:
>> 
>>> On 8/16/2024 11:32 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 8/16/24 7:02 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> *This abolishes the notion of undecidability*
>>>>> As with all math and logic we have expressions of language
>>>>> that are true on the basis of their meaning expressed
>>>>> in this same language. Unless expression x has a connection
>>>>> (through a sequence of true preserving operations) in system
>>>>> F to its semantic meanings expressed in language L of F
>>>>> x is simply untrue in F.
>>>> 
>>>> But you clearly don't understand the meaning of "undecidability"
>>> 
>>> Not at all. I am doing the same sort thing that ZFC
>>> did to conquer Russell's Paradox.
>> 
>> Zermelo constructed a new formal theory that does not have that paradox.
>> Note that the paradox was not present in Cantor's original theory as
>> Cantor did not promise that Russell's set exists. But Cantor's original
>> presentation was not fully formal so it was not clear that Russell's
>> set does not exist.
>> 
> 
> I am redefining the notion of a formal system to get
> rid of undecidability. This requires few changes.

Put a draft and a request for discussion on a web site.

-- 
Mikko