Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: This makes all Analytic(Olcott) truth computable
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:14:05 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <v9uusd$2q1fo$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v86olp$5km4$1@dont-email.me> <v9ffpr$3s45o$1@dont-email.me> <v9fkd4$3se8c$1@dont-email.me> <v9kg66$tdvb$1@dont-email.me> <v9nbjf$1dj8q$1@dont-email.me> <20b1dea98eda49e74e822c96b37565bb3eb36013@i2pn2.org> <v9o4p2$1h5u4$1@dont-email.me> <cd12fb81fcd05d2e112fc8aca2f5b791c521cfc9@i2pn2.org> <v9oddf$1i745$2@dont-email.me> <7f2a1f77084810d4cee18ac3b44251601380b93a@i2pn2.org> <v9ogmp$1i745$6@dont-email.me> <662de0ccc3dc5a5f0be0918d340aa3314d51a348@i2pn2.org> <v9oj4r$1i745$8@dont-email.me> <02642e518edd3aa9152cd47e4e527f21ee53a0e8@i2pn2.org> <v9okho$1i745$10@dont-email.me> <60c0214582c7f97e49ef6f8853bff95569774f97@i2pn2.org> <v9p7im$1p6bp$4@dont-email.me> <d67278caa0b8782725e806b61adf892028f2bf89@i2pn2.org> <v9qd2p$1tedb$10@dont-email.me> <4d8c7b1c69915ebbe108d7f4e29cf6172eac7759@i2pn2.org> <v9qel5$1tedb$13@dont-email.me> <43690773dba43c5d93d11635af0a26532e5be390@i2pn2.org> <v9qgn7$1tedb$15@dont-email.me> <v9sisj$2bs9m$1@dont-email.me> <v9slov$2c67u$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 10:14:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3c3cda58ed7c128269c60e73272d160a";
	logging-data="2950648"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18BnTceRRbJn9LdYws4zcyW"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3A/pPUq6uI2TdzUeKr3maueUXeI=
Bytes: 3397

On 2024-08-18 11:26:22 +0000, olcott said:

> On 8/18/2024 5:37 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-08-17 15:47:51 +0000, olcott said:
>> 
>>> On 8/17/2024 10:33 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 8/17/24 11:12 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 8/17/2024 9:53 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I guess you consider all the papers they wrote describing the effects 
>>>>>> of their definitions "nothing"
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Not at all and you know this.
>>>>> One change had many effects yet was still one change.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> But would mean nothing without showing the affects of that change.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Yet again with your imprecise use of words.
>>> When any tiniest portion of the meaning of an expression
>>> has been defined this teeny tiny piece of the definition
>>> makes this expression not pure random gibberish.
>>> 
>>> Meaningless does not mean has less meaning, it is
>>> an idiom for having zero meaning.
>>> https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/meaningless
>> 
>> You are lying. According to that page the word "meaningless"
>> has two meanings. The other is 'having no real importance or value'.
>> 
> 
> OK. I always use the base meaning of a term as its only meaning.
> That makes things much simpler if everyone knows this standard.

People have different opions about which meaning is the "base"
meaning.

> For example a liar must be intentionally deceptive not merely mistaken.

For example people may regard you as a liar if you say something untrue
when you were too lazy to check the facts.

-- 
Mikko