Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v9vdrv$2qll6$8@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Python <python@invalid.org> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: [SR and synchronization] Cognitive Dissonances and Mental Blockage Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 14:29:51 +0200 Organization: CCCP Lines: 73 Message-ID: <v9vdrv$2qll6$8@dont-email.me> References: <v9q6eu$1tlm9$1@dont-email.me> <17ec8558f5c4589e$390099$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <v9t2q0$2e1h9$1@dont-email.me> <17ecdc038df14564$366853$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <v9v656$2qll6$3@dont-email.me> <17ed1a775cabf842$496153$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <v9v8e5$2qll6$5@dont-email.me> <17ed2038f33f249a$496154$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 14:29:52 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c563859fd10f39d9a1de30e4f18dc670"; logging-data="2971302"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19oAvURPQrbRm13SnZkyfXN" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:dZlWaFcPpZsyvoGCawt9DMvzGHw= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <17ed2038f33f249a$496154$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 4500 Le 19/08/2024 à 14:14, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > W dniu 19.08.2024 o 12:57, Python pisze: >> Le 19/08/2024 à 12:28, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>> W dniu 19.08.2024 o 12:18, Python pisze: >>>> Le 18/08/2024 à 17:24, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>>>> W dniu 18.08.2024 o 17:08, Volney pisze: >>>>>> On 8/17/2024 8:56 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>>>>>> W dniu 17.08.2024 o 14:52, Python pisze: >>>>>>>> **An Interesting Case of Mental Blockage and Cognitive >>>>>>>> Dissonance:** >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Einstein-Poincaré Synchronization Procedure and Dr. Lengrand* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What’s fascinating about certain cranks is that just when you >>>>>>>> think you’ve seen all the absurdities they can come up with, >>>>>>>> they manage to produce something even worse. Their cognitive >>>>>>>> dissonance and ability to pull out bizarre notions from who >>>>>>>> knows where, on top of a perfectly well-defined technical >>>>>>>> procedure, is astonishing. We’ve seen this before with GPS, >>>>>>>> where Hachel invents all sorts of fantasies, like atomic clocks >>>>>>>> in the receivers or synchronization with a clock infinitely far >>>>>>>> away in a fourth spatial dimension... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is a report of exchanges on the synchronization procedure >>>>>>>> described by Einstein in his 1905 paper, discussions that took >>>>>>>> place 17 years ago and more recently on sci.physics.relativity >>>>>>>> and fr.sci.physique. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/fr.sci.physique/c/KgqI9gqTkR8/m/oMc9X0XjCWMJ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Reminders on the Procedure:* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Two identical clocks, A and B, are stationary relative to each >>>>>>>> other at a certain distance. Their identical functioning (within >>>>>>>> measurement accuracy) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Taking 2 identical pendulum clocks blows >>>>>>> this pathetic bullshit out. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Wrong. Two identical pendulum clocks, one on Earth, one on the >>>>>> moon, wouldn't even be close to functioning identically. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Indeed, stupid Mike, and that's why Python's >>>>> "Their identical functioning (within >>>>> measurement accuracy)" is just some delusion >>>>> of a fanatic idiot. >>>> >>>> Oh, it was a "nothing goes" day for Maciej Wozniak yesterday :-) >>> >>> No [snip slander] >> >> Are you that delusional that you cannot realize that pretending >> that building and putting at different places two clocks with "identical >> functioning (within measurement accuracy)" is impossible is *weird*? >> >> Seriously Wozniak? > > No, neither seriously nor any other way. > Just another slander of yours. > Still, your "logic" of > "identical clocks"=>"identical functioning > (within measurement accuracy)" is kind of > absurd. Like most of your "logic". “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.” That witticism — I'll call it “Einstein Insanity” — is usually attributed to Albert Einstein. He wrote about you, after all :-)