| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vHaF9ioPhcsbs94SgSd3Fn69VRA@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fdn.fr!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <vHaF9ioPhcsbs94SgSd3Fn69VRA@jntp> JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Why a time of the real world must be galilean References: <180fc4a84f1891a8$1162$1228337$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <181154a9986e9f2f$4267$1238888$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <WaumABhKFsF-a7vEtKketJC1SU8@jntp> <18115e21819b88b8$3999$1258271$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <wTCUwiP8r_6HV9_JWjpnDzzrCS8@jntp> <1811706c300cfbc4$3891$1234847$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <TOUnAg2Ped0qmfbpGFGHi5K3c70@jntp> <676005cc$0$5206$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <1811a604ad74e4e9$3898$1234847$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <67601ad9$0$16845$426a34cc@news.free.fr> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: 31S8GtWPlvLNtvFcCrRn2BjtyGo JNTP-ThreadID: 180f1778e64eec8d$354$1238888$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=vHaF9ioPhcsbs94SgSd3Fn69VRA@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/1.0 JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net Date: Mon, 16 Dec 24 13:18:53 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-12-16T13:18:53Z/9143555"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> Bytes: 3266 Lines: 37 Le 16/12/2024 à 13:19, nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) a écrit : > You should rejoice instead. Since the whole framework of the world > and all physical theories must conform to the relativity postulate > it should be real easy to find falsifications of it. > > Easy, isn't it? > > Jan No, no, precisely, it is not easy. All the experimental proof that we have, we have it on fairly limited experiments. Because, in fact, we cannot go up in accelerated rockets to show that it is Dr. Hachel who is right, and not Albert Einstein. But that will come, with the progress of science, we arrive at certain results consistent with Hachel's thinking, and not that of Einstein. Einstein cannot explain instantaneous transfers of information (that is what Alain Aspect says), where Hachel does not even need to explain it, so obvious is the theoretical fact. No, no, it is not easy. The same for rotating frames of reference. Dr. Hachel explains that there is a radial contraction of the rotating disk and gives the correct transformations. But how can we prove here again that it is Hachel who masters the entirety of the theory? Do you think that we can spin a disk with a relativistic tangential speed easily? So no, it is not easy to show that Einstein was wrong about part of his thinking, which does not take into account all the concepts. Somewhat strange concepts, but whose mathematical needs do not exceed those of high school (16-18 years old). R.H.