Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vOmcnYVG-OHpKZP6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 18:29:08 +0000
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
 fractions? (infinitary)
Newsgroups: sci.math
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org>
 <4bc3b086-247a-4547-89cc-1d47f502659d@tha.de> <ve0n4i$1vps$1@news.muc.de>
 <ve10qb$1p7ge$1@dont-email.me> <ve117p$vob$1@news.muc.de>
 <ve315q$24f8f$3@dont-email.me> <ve46vu$324$2@news.muc.de>
 <ve5u2i$2jobg$4@dont-email.me> <ve6329$19d5$1@news.muc.de>
 <ve64kl$2m0nm$4@dont-email.me> <ve66f3$19d5$2@news.muc.de>
 <ve683o$6c2o$1@solani.org> <ve6a23$19d5$3@news.muc.de>
 <ve6c3b$6esq$2@solani.org> <ve6kl1$207d$1@news.muc.de>
 <ve96jj$38qui$2@dont-email.me> <ve97c7$2f64$1@news.muc.de>
 <ve97qj$38qui$4@dont-email.me>
 <3f5fcf13171337f1c3d2ef84cc149be327648451@i2pn2.org>
 <veecr3$7rap$1@dont-email.me>
 <97b84c07aa526903a0788584f7f7ae9121f8b81f@i2pn2.org>
 <veirkn$desj$2@solani.org>
 <db221d267ae4b956cd0818c9b5ccc0311df97d1e@i2pn2.org>
 <60f1280e-e226-4314-8eca-da5410be8ca3@tha.de>
 <96a7aa944085e76faed69c8db9a8dca599e1a159@i2pn2.org>
 <vejhcb$ditg$1@solani.org>
 <2c732eefb860986209bd46ed88391ddceaddff55@i2pn2.org>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 11:29:25 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2c732eefb860986209bd46ed88391ddceaddff55@i2pn2.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <vOmcnYVG-OHpKZP6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 29
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-aKzAfOf9B2W/3mqv/x1dXNWyCUiCpAVZwSGiLKg4/JdsUxZM2qOz1mnnFpNBuFnBFGUNpBOBBPewx/F!6jFwLmIUF1kUZM/dqkWe/P8P5SsLLA7V6yOiY9Nc1ws3KgLYnn+6YltAPCZT7MfSNHnL0XScQA0c!ow==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3408

On 10/15/2024 08:51 AM, joes wrote:
> Am Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:37:31 +0200 schrieb WM:
>> On 14.10.2024 18:04, joes wrote:
>>> Am Mon, 14 Oct 2024 15:40:01 +0200 schrieb WM:
>>>> On 14.10.2024 14:15, joes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> No, we are taking the complete, actually infinite set which reaches
>>>>> to "before" w.
>>>> and fills the space between 0 and ω evenly. Same happens with the
>>>> doubled set between 0 and ω2.
>>> No, there is no consequent infinity. The even numbers do not go 0, 2,
>>> 4, ..., w, w+2, w+4, ..., w*2
>> Either the doubled numbers are natural, then half of them have not been
>> among the original set, or all natural numbers have been doubled, then
>> the result contains infinite numbers.
> Which "half"?
>
>> That doubling _all_ natural numbers only yields _all_ natural numbers is
>> impossible.
> Of course. But all doubled naturals are themselves natural.
>

Aliquot parts, i.e. density where the "half of the integers are even",
and the equivalency of the countably infinite, where "integers are
1-1 squares" were around centuries and THOUSANDS of years before
Grosseteste and Galileo, and are such OLD HAT that this "old wrapped
as new" is long, long, long past its freshness dating.