| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<va1eo4$39jpi$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Python (was Re: I did not inhale) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:57:07 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 21 Message-ID: <va1eo4$39jpi$1@dont-email.me> References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <20240408075547.000061e8@gmail.com> <g52cnWOOwoz_son7nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <uvbe3m$2cun7$1@dont-email.me> <uvbfii$3mom0$1@news.xmission.com> <20240412094809.811@kylheku.com> <87il0mm94y.fsf@tudado.org> <way-20240413091747@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <87il0lldf8.fsf@tudado.org> <choices-20240413123957@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <v9lm2k$12qhv$1@dont-email.me> <v9m4gd$14scu$1@dont-email.me> <20240815182717.189@kylheku.com> <v9npls$1fjus$1@dont-email.me> <v9posc$1rpdj$1@dont-email.me> <v9pvoo$1sn55$1@dont-email.me> <v9r60h$2289h$2@dont-email.me> <v9sa91$2afht$1@dont-email.me> <v9tv8o$2iahp$1@dont-email.me> <v9uso3$2pdrg$2@dont-email.me> <v9v0n6$2q8h3$1@dont-email.me> <v9v8pr$2r6q2$2@dont-email.me> <va0j0i$3267t$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:57:09 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3d89229229cc5613f9a4092209d4175c"; logging-data="3460914"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+VrznNdr+5ubwkoMyXPwoMe5/iJj71Okk=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:91K/so34ISDxU1GJtBi0tJU1tkI= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <va0j0i$3267t$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2559 On 2024-08-20 01:03, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 13:03:23 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > >> Again. It is called overlapped I/O. You can start multiple >> *asynchronous* I/O operations from a thread. > > I’m not talking about using threads. I’m talking about avoiding threads, > and all their potential for difficult-to-fix race-condition-type bugs. > > I’m talking about situations where the bottleneck is the I/O, not the CPU, > so multithreading gets you nothing. It seems you suffer some form of dyslexia. I clearly stated that all instances of overlapped I/O is started from the same/single/one thread. Better now? -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de