Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: This makes all Analytic(Olcott) truth computable
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 12:53:08 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <va1p24$3bb53$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v86olp$5km4$1@dont-email.me> <v9kg66$tdvb$1@dont-email.me> <v9nbjf$1dj8q$1@dont-email.me> <20b1dea98eda49e74e822c96b37565bb3eb36013@i2pn2.org> <v9o4p2$1h5u4$1@dont-email.me> <cd12fb81fcd05d2e112fc8aca2f5b791c521cfc9@i2pn2.org> <v9oddf$1i745$2@dont-email.me> <7f2a1f77084810d4cee18ac3b44251601380b93a@i2pn2.org> <v9ogmp$1i745$6@dont-email.me> <662de0ccc3dc5a5f0be0918d340aa3314d51a348@i2pn2.org> <v9oj4r$1i745$8@dont-email.me> <02642e518edd3aa9152cd47e4e527f21ee53a0e8@i2pn2.org> <v9okho$1i745$10@dont-email.me> <60c0214582c7f97e49ef6f8853bff95569774f97@i2pn2.org> <v9p7im$1p6bp$4@dont-email.me> <d67278caa0b8782725e806b61adf892028f2bf89@i2pn2.org> <v9qd2p$1tedb$10@dont-email.me> <4d8c7b1c69915ebbe108d7f4e29cf6172eac7759@i2pn2.org> <v9qel5$1tedb$13@dont-email.me> <43690773dba43c5d93d11635af0a26532e5be390@i2pn2.org> <v9qgn7$1tedb$15@dont-email.me> <v9sisj$2bs9m$1@dont-email.me> <v9slov$2c67u$3@dont-email.me> <v9uusd$2q1fo$1@dont-email.me> <v9vfh4$2rjt1$10@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 11:53:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c68d48608550e7e7fabcc3f8200ba7d3";
	logging-data="3517603"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/qBReB7tCgAO6nx+LXUyhh"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2pPLxwwwZ0rumXZSLRjbffUMjEE=
Bytes: 4372

On 2024-08-19 12:58:12 +0000, olcott said:

> On 8/19/2024 3:14 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-08-18 11:26:22 +0000, olcott said:
>> 
>>> On 8/18/2024 5:37 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2024-08-17 15:47:51 +0000, olcott said:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 8/17/2024 10:33 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/17/24 11:12 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/17/2024 9:53 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I guess you consider all the papers they wrote describing the effects 
>>>>>>>> of their definitions "nothing"
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Not at all and you know this.
>>>>>>> One change had many effects yet was still one change.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> But would mean nothing without showing the affects of that change.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yet again with your imprecise use of words.
>>>>> When any tiniest portion of the meaning of an expression
>>>>> has been defined this teeny tiny piece of the definition
>>>>> makes this expression not pure random gibberish.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Meaningless does not mean has less meaning, it is
>>>>> an idiom for having zero meaning.
>>>>> https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/meaningless
>>>> 
>>>> You are lying. According to that page the word "meaningless"
>>>> has two meanings. The other is 'having no real importance or value'.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> OK. I always use the base meaning of a term as its only meaning.
>>> That makes things much simpler if everyone knows this standard.
>> 
>> People have different opions about which meaning is the "base"
>> meaning.
>> 
> 
> The most commonly used sense meaning at the first
> index in the dictionary.

If you want to use this you should say so and specify the dictionary
in the beginning of your opus. You shold not choose a dictionary
that presents obsolete and archaic meanings first.

>>> For example a liar must be intentionally deceptive not merely mistaken.
>> 
>> For example people may regard you as a liar if you say something untrue
>> when you were too lazy to check the facts.
> 
> I am redefining the foundations of logic thus my definitions
> are stipulated to override and supersede the original definitions.

If you want to use definitions other that the first meaning given
by the dictionary, you must present the definition before the
first use in each opus that uses it.

> It took a long time to reverse-engineer the subtle nuances of
> the exact details of what needed to be changed.

It seems that you have not yet completed that task.

-- 
Mikko