Path: ...!news.misty.com!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 15:41:39 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <va26ej$3c12c$9@dont-email.me>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp>
 <92189533-0c1f-4532-816f-564651cc8bf7@att.net>
 <zzRMVwrDvZCAHeIta8vMnBBxp8E@jntp>
 <155cdc8a628d47be1632791227bccf99425b1d5e@i2pn2.org>
 <en_fjxuLKegQPxOwdC8lXsKVbbI@jntp>
 <b6f3db1f122addc847d551f14766c9bc090a2d39@i2pn2.org>
 <SBmJp-HYdOtrtKI0zcA77PJiC-w@jntp> <va258m$3c12c$5@dont-email.me>
 <vxv23VuZu1H5R4yImt76MXq9xUc@jntp> <va25lt$3c12c$6@dont-email.me>
 <gtN-RrwEMwA7NnzNxz-eJIaELnc@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 15:41:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e7766270ddb83778ad61a74e624af08e";
	logging-data="3540044"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19W1ceAuq3wODGXy5iAwvvC"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:S9RWEdBR1rhZqu9ySCyBXKoUNdE=
In-Reply-To: <gtN-RrwEMwA7NnzNxz-eJIaELnc@jntp>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2523

Le 20/08/2024 à 15:39, WM a écrit :
> Le 20/08/2024 à 15:28, Python a écrit :
>> Le 20/08/2024 à 15:25, WM a écrit :
>>> Le 20/08/2024 à 15:21, Python a écrit :
>>>> Le 20/08/2024 à 15:19, WM a écrit :
>>>
>>>>> This is fact: The function NUF(x) grows by 1 at every unit 
>>>>> fraction. It starts from 0.
>>>>
>>>> But 0 is not a unit fraction. sigh.
>>>
>>> Therefore NUF(0) = 0. NUF(u) = 1 only at the first unit fraction u.
>>
>> There in NO such first unit fraction.
> 
> There are unit fractions.

Definitely.

> NUF(x) counts them all. But it nowhere counts 
> more than 1. 

False.

> Try to think.

Don't talk about something you do not experience.

>>>> Are you about to teach this at Technische Hochschule Augsburg
> 
> If you can explain how more than one first unit fraction can bolster 
> NUF(x), I will adopt your explanation. But only if it does not violate 
> ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0.

Are you about to "teach" this nonsense at Hochschule Augsburg again next
year, crank Wolfgang Mückenheim or did they have fired you as you
deserve?