Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<va2j79$3f6t8$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: cyclists attack auto driver Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 13:19:38 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 76 Message-ID: <va2j79$3f6t8$3@dont-email.me> References: <cp16cjheocvhmb4fo8t2rq4hsrf3hmgjqg@4ax.com> <v9vnba$2tip9$1@dont-email.me> <vso6cj9qss2q36a48lnnd9t64ve6kjmeoi@4ax.com> <v9vpof$2tip9$7@dont-email.me> <kqq6cj50f2oikqds9sls0f4mkauvn01jda@4ax.com> <va0qjd$333np$3@dont-email.me> <jak8cjhtigf2grhab4mdi5jj1cn6sgl62p@4ax.com> <va23d4$3chus$2@dont-email.me> <va2chv$3e7nj$1@dont-email.me> <s0e9cjpqqvc5b4csm7ba6juopur68ufu80@4ax.com> <va2e79$3e2nb$1@dont-email.me> <a0h9cjd3keumjl5ido7au5q8a0418b9d4f@4ax.com> <nth9cjtkmu6fel54vai2bap0qc3qfmdat3@4ax.com> Reply-To: frkrygow@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 19:19:38 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a7d30f9ad802583716c44d08a1ad9d6e"; logging-data="3644328"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18o/mUqFssoMRBpQfvr8PSEWCLGKoFtMqE=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:h3/pwvWBu9tHMk9lmODoxE368jA= In-Reply-To: <nth9cjtkmu6fel54vai2bap0qc3qfmdat3@4ax.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 5035 On 8/20/2024 12:59 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: > On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 12:33:06 -0400, Catrike Ryder > <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:54:16 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >> >>> On 8/20/2024 10:38 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote: >>>> On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 11:25:49 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 8/20/2024 8:49 AM, AMuzi wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The formal education racket is not for everyone, but education is nearly >>>>>> free, requiring only time, diligence and access to a few used book stores. >>>>> >>>>> Sorry, Andrew, that's true only for the lowest definition of "education." >>>>> >>>>> In one of the first engineering classes I took, the teacher said >>>>> something like "Look at the guys standing to your left and right. They >>>>> are probably not going to make it through this curriculum. Only about >>>>> ten percent of the men who start this program manage to complete it." >>>>> >>>>> And he was right. It's very foolish to believe that everyone is equally >>>>> intelligent, and that everyone can succeed if they just try really hard. >>>>> >>>>> I certainly recall students who were diligent, studied hard, got special >>>>> help, spent tons of time on their work and still failed. I felt sorry >>>>> for them, but if they were not up to standards, they did not pass. >>>> >>>> Education is a tool. It's what one does with the education that >>>> counts, not the piece of fancy paper they hang on the wall and brag >>>> about. >>> >>> While it's true that autodidacts often suffer gaps of >>> education, it's also true that graduates include those who >>> tested well with little post college retention and also >>> those of extremely narrow education. >>> >>> Neither is a perfect solution for everyone. > >> ...and many with a near, or even a totallly worthless degree. >> https://www.universities.com/resources/most-useless-degrees > > Such lists are useful for avoiding professions that don't pay well. > However, they are often interpreted as suggesting one should not take > any classes in the various listed "useless degree" fields. While I > majored in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, the next most USEFUL > classes I took were (in order starting with most useful): > - Economics > - Psychology > - Tractor driving and mechanics > - Computer programming > - Philosophy > None of these classes would have been useful had I not concentrated on > my chosen profession. For example, I know engineers who dabble in > philosophy, but no psychologists or economists who know anything about > engineering. :-) When my wife returned to college, she and I took a Music Appreciation course together. On the advice of a musician friend, we took the more advanced version intended for music majors, not the General Education version. Anyway: The professor knew of my department. Several times, he make some slightly disparaging cracks about a certain "engineer" who became a music major. I eventually pointed out to him (diplomatically) that the guy he called an "engineer" was a guy who had actually dropped out of engineering. And I also pointed out that I was voluntarily taking a course in his program. He would never be able to take a course in mine. BTW, despite that last comment of mine, we still get along just fine. I have several friends among Music faculty. -- - Frank Krygowski