Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Anyone that disagrees with this is not telling the truth --- V5
 --- Professor Sipser
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 07:30:36 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <va4mle$3s0hu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <va104l$376ed$4@dont-email.me>
 <cd375f68f97a737988bab8c1332b7802509ff6ea@i2pn2.org>
 <va13po$376ed$7@dont-email.me>
 <d42e5d30ea5f1c067283cb04d8a7293e2117188e@i2pn2.org>
 <va24hl$3cvgv$1@dont-email.me>
 <431deaa157cdae1cae73a1b24268a61cf8ec2c1c@i2pn2.org>
 <va38qh$3ia79$1@dont-email.me>
 <7a1c569a699e79bfa146affbbae3eac7b91cd263@i2pn2.org>
 <va3f7o$3ipp3$1@dont-email.me>
 <729cc551062c13875686d266a5453a488058e81c@i2pn2.org>
 <va3kac$3nd5c$1@dont-email.me>
 <148bf4dd91f32379a6d81a621fb7ec3fc1e00db0@i2pn2.org>
 <va3lai$3nd5c$2@dont-email.me> <va46sd$3pr24$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:30:38 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6fc4e6078b6f11ac657df23e0012e04d";
	logging-data="4063806"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/hF4B+4Zx5U5sJL92TKbc2"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:l6+UL92++HgXl/x06NBjAtUVG6k=
In-Reply-To: <va46sd$3pr24$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3169

On 8/21/2024 3:01 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-08-21 03:01:38 +0000, olcott said:
>>
>> *We are only talking about one single point*
>> Professor Sipser must have understood that an HHH(DDD)
>> that does abort is supposed predict what would happen
>> if it never aborted.
> 
> Professor Sipser understood that what is not a part of the text
> is not a part of the agreement. What H is required to predict
> is fully determined by the words "halt decider H". The previous
> word "simulating" refers to an implementation detail and does
> not affect the requirements.
> 

<MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
     If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D
     until H correctly determines that its simulated D would never
     stop running unless aborted then

     H can abort its simulation of D and correctly report that D
     specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations.
</MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>

It is crucial to the requirements in that it specifies that
H is required to predict
(a) The behavior specified by the finite string D
(b) As measured by the correct partial simulation of D by H
(c) When H would never abort its simulation of F
(d) This includes H simulating itself simulating D


> Your words are so obviously crooked that only fool can be fooled.
> 
> 



-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer