Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<va6fab$8tdn$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Peter <confused@nospam.net>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Mark Gurman on Apple's integrated 5G modem chip designs
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 05:37:31 +0100
Organization: -
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <va6fab$8tdn$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v9u9qk$2gab$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v9ubq8$1do6t$1@solani.org> <va691e$6u4d$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 06:37:32 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6895df5a0988a2acd27df90915f04da0";
	logging-data="292279"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/S131GlOt3u/l2hTJwAUs+"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Pn94A98OBfgSBQR7dZhyKfL5WqA=
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
X-No-Archive: yes
Bytes: 1925

sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:

>> If I'm paying $1000+ for a premium phone, I want the 'best' components in
>> it. I don't care who made them, just that the components are reliable and
>> work well.
> 
> It's not just the cost of buying modems from Qualcomm, since designing 
> and building their own modems is costing them billions that they may 
> never recover in savings.
> 
> The bigger issue is being able to integrate a modem into their Bionic 
> SOC. All the other SOC makers, Qualcomm, Samsung, Mediatek, and Huawei, 
> have already integrated the modem, even on lower-end SOCs. This saves 
> assembly cost and space on the board as well as increasing data transfer 
> speeds between the modem and the processor.

Do you think nospam would say that integrating a 5G modem onto the SOC is
not needed and not wanted because Apple can't figure out how to do it?