Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<va6fab$8tdn$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Peter <confused@nospam.net> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: Mark Gurman on Apple's integrated 5G modem chip designs Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 05:37:31 +0100 Organization: - Lines: 18 Message-ID: <va6fab$8tdn$1@dont-email.me> References: <v9u9qk$2gab$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v9ubq8$1do6t$1@solani.org> <va691e$6u4d$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 06:37:32 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6895df5a0988a2acd27df90915f04da0"; logging-data="292279"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/S131GlOt3u/l2hTJwAUs+" Cancel-Lock: sha1:Pn94A98OBfgSBQR7dZhyKfL5WqA= X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846 X-No-Archive: yes Bytes: 1925 sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: >> If I'm paying $1000+ for a premium phone, I want the 'best' components in >> it. I don't care who made them, just that the components are reliable and >> work well. > > It's not just the cost of buying modems from Qualcomm, since designing > and building their own modems is costing them billions that they may > never recover in savings. > > The bigger issue is being able to integrate a modem into their Bionic > SOC. All the other SOC makers, Qualcomm, Samsung, Mediatek, and Huawei, > have already integrated the modem, even on lower-end SOCs. This saves > assembly cost and space on the board as well as increasing data transfer > speeds between the modem and the processor. Do you think nospam would say that integrating a 5G modem onto the SOC is not needed and not wanted because Apple can't figure out how to do it?