Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <va6rjs$c7ca$1@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<va6rjs$c7ca$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Sync two clocks
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 11:07:24 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <va6rjs$c7ca$1@dont-email.me>
References: <u18wy1Hl3tOo1DpOF6WVSF0s-08@jntp> <v9nant$1d2us$1@dont-email.me> <vPP1Z1BJfE1Dt7SYhCzEo7ZQWFI@jntp> <va0a4f$30p95$1@dont-email.me> <Zwwc8OsxqpAwTzvPkie6NmgxmY8@jntp> <va1tp9$3c0qh$1@dont-email.me> <aeuL_3xao9-_kSf51ssMUTgW-s8@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:07:24 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3cfd338bf46b6359abb1838ccf8df492";
	logging-data="400778"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18+Xp/A3y6ysllWtO7rv29Z"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QBhWPZ2IY9YM/78DNbU3ti0JXe4=
Bytes: 1922

On 2024-08-20 11:27:56 +0000, Richard Hachel said:

> Le 20/08/2024 à 13:13, Mikko a écrit :
>>> 
>>> I have explained these things a hundred times.
>>> It is impossible to synchronize two watches A and B located in 
>>> different places.
>> 
>> So you agree that Paul B. Andersen's prodedure is doable and achieves
>> what you call "impssible".
> 
> You have to understand the words and concepts, and in relativistic 
> theory, this is very poorly done.

What words or concepts in Paul B. Andersen's prodedure did you consider
poorly undestood?

If you consider "doable" as I used it in my response then I may clarify
that nothing is doable if it is not clear from the specification what
the intended action should be. But as far as I can see there is nothing
in that procedure that could be regarded as "poorly understood".

-- 
Mikko