Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: 200V at 10mA
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:36:27 +0100
Organization: A patent noisesome spinner
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <va70qr$coo9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <va558r$2lno$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 11:36:28 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4cdbaeb7d9f1519f40a710bbf7a6a5fa";
	logging-data="418569"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18uMYbswQbSP/R5I7Fwl8r5"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BRGwyjld6KmJ3flXbwAoWdBxoyk=
In-Reply-To: <va558r$2lno$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1501

On 21/08/2024 17:39, Edward Rawde wrote:
> SYMATTR InstName C5

If you want to stick with that way-over-complex design you could look 
into versapac 6 windings coupled inductors.

I would not even try that circuit. Better to redesign to use either a 
single inductor or a dual coupled inductor like DRQ127 series. if 
necessary follow with a cockcroft-walton multiplying rectifier.

UC3843 control chip would be ideal, cheap, reliable, easy to use, 
multisourced.

piglet