| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<va7n6l$ftuo$8@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:58:13 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 17 Message-ID: <va7n6l$ftuo$8@dont-email.me> References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <en_fjxuLKegQPxOwdC8lXsKVbbI@jntp> <b6f3db1f122addc847d551f14766c9bc090a2d39@i2pn2.org> <va1ra4$3bld7$1@dont-email.me> <cB1y4KsEseyrfvMXAJJ2TijMcX4@jntp> <va31ko$3havl$1@dont-email.me> <VqqLFKi62z9rl82Gg4Mxsdp4YYg@jntp> <va4h96$3r7nv$1@dont-email.me> <H5iV5HXUBwUzWtVKRZj7h4N2LdA@jntp> <va543m$3u6dp$1@dont-email.me> <kN73KZJabPuiasJJ0DR6UOOrMHE@jntp> <b548785503d0fefec3670696110f93dcea363e8a@i2pn2.org> Reply-To: invalid@example.invalid MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:58:13 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0a0516132ace15082095702a4e623ab8"; logging-data="522200"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/7A0cOVqe2q/Vs1qVyDRNH" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:aGMf84wNS+S8f3hkpDh9LvBt4+E= Content-Language: de-DE In-Reply-To: <b548785503d0fefec3670696110f93dcea363e8a@i2pn2.org> Bytes: 1987 Am 22.08.2024 um 15:36 schrieb joes: > Am Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:54:46 +0000 schrieb WM: >> Le 21/08/2024 à 18:20, FromTheRafters a écrit : >>> WM presented the following explanation : >> >>>> Since no unit fraction is below or at zero, the end is before. What >>>> else? >>> No end, Duh!! >> In a linear order of elements which all have distances from each other, >> there is necessarily a last one Yeah, like in the case of the integers. :-) > Why is no end impossible? Because in Mückenhausen there are no infinite sets.