Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<va7q2k$gkmu$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: Politics OT-Re: Books Banned in Utah.
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 12:47:16 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 102
Message-ID: <va7q2k$gkmu$3@dont-email.me>
References: <v90pgc$3clah$1@dont-email.me>
 <jtmhbj9orggi70sh6289gqp4r1d1fj5is6@4ax.com> <v9g04g$3v26h$1@dont-email.me>
 <t1kpbjp3p5sf25daro2vph7in7vg211mgt@4ax.com> <v9iv43$iig5$1@dont-email.me>
 <3sasbj98eu1j1s954e1vnbshkht3uiu84j@4ax.com>
 <n9f8cjpecn8bbj4rtsdplp5hs2fptpkl36@4ax.com>
 <72668a2c-44e6-4ab5-a0b8-217574483c03@mouse-potato.com>
 <9n4ccjp64j2mfdv0g0l19ro64str1lo6g1@4ax.com> <va5f00$3vk4h$2@dont-email.me>
 <TBtxO.67579$07Gb.31965@fx02.iad> <va68qr$6u1l$1@dont-email.me>
 <va6but$79q5$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 18:47:17 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="78c08d4f5c72898ed2c93c15c86114c5";
	logging-data="545502"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19G7A/wHyierUzsVILfSmYPCwdK+eck4FY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XItIW9ZWYVO1e6vLvVXueuh6HKE=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <va6but$79q5$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 5874

On 8/21/2024 11:40 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
> On 8/21/24 19:46, Cryptoengineer wrote:
>> On 8/21/2024 6:10 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>>> Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> On 8/21/2024 12:21 PM, Paul S Person wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 09:18:51 -0700, Bobbie Sellers
>>>>> <blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/19/24 23:54, The Horny Goat wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 09:29:21 -0700, Paul S Person
>>>>>>> <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Which ones?  The usual suspects have accused every Republican
>>>>>>>>> president since Eisenhower of being a Nazi.  (Except Ford, for
>>>>>>>>> some reason; him, they just tried to assassinate.  Twice.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tried and, as with Reagan and Trump failed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Did Ike ever get accused of being a Nazi? Seems his activities 
>>>>>>> 1942-45
>>>>>>> should have forever inoculated him against that particular canard.
>>>>>>> Ditto Truman, JFK and Nixon all of whom served in combat. (Well 
>>>>>>> Truman
>>>>>>> was a WW1 artilleryman)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Democrat Truman was never accused of dictatorial tendencies.
>>>>>> He could threaten violence for bad reviews of his daughter Margaret.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Republican Eisenhower was only fascist toward gays and Communists
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Democrat JFK was left in pain from his wartime injuries.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Lyndon Baines Johnson served like Nixon in the USN which
>>>>>> allowed him a lot of time in Hollywood getting lessons.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Republican Nixon only technically served in Combat but did
>>>>>> work important to the War Effort. He succumbed to the idea of power
>>>>>> as the president which lead to Watergate and his resignation.
>>>>>> But for wartime
>>>>>> <https://thepurcellchronicles.blogspot.com/2017/05/commander- 
>>>>>> richard-m-nixon-and-world-war.html>
>>>>>>     No one ever called these men NAZIs except maybe extreme 
>>>>>> pacifists.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Same for Republican Gerald Ford. Saved by a Gay man from
>>>>>> assassination.  Gay Man's life was ruined by the publicity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     and Democrat Jimmy Carter, victim of Republican chicanery.
>>>>>
>>>>> If it is true that Bush I cut a deal with Iran to not free the
>>>>> hostages until Reagan was elected, then for "chicanery" we should read
>>>>> "treason".
>>>>
>>>> Deals have two sides. What quid pro quo did Bush offer?
>>>>
>>>> I've always been under the impression that it was just
>>>> Iran giving Clinton a final 'fuck you in particular'.
>>>> I know there is an 'October Surprise' theory, but again,
>>>> what did Iran get out of it?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think you two are talking different Bush Eras.   It's not
>>> difficult to believe that someone in Reagan's orbit influenced
>>> the Iranians in order to smooth the path to a Reagan presidency.
>>> Especially when one considers the subsequent Iran-Contra affair.
>>>
>>> As for Ms. Clinton, the GOP has been attacking her personally
>>> and continuously since 1992, trying pretty much every dirty
>>> politcal trick in the book.
>>
>>
>> Um, no. Paul S claimed that Bush I cut a deal with Iran.
>> The Clinton I referred to was Bill Clinton, who was president
>> during the Iran Hostage crisis. The final group of hostages
>> was released Jan 20, 1981, mere hours after Clinton had
>> handed over power to Reagan.
>>
>> Bush I was a private citizen during Clinton's presidency,
>> and could not legally engage in diplomacy.
>>
>> pt
>      You have flunked your history exam!
>      Clinton came after Bush I and before Bush II
>      Reagan was before Clinton.
>      Go to Wiki and learn recent USA History and even older history.
>      It was Bush I who was Reagan's VP and former CIA leader.
> If anyone dealt with Iran it was he because while Ronnie might
> approve, the rule is do the deed then ask for forgiveness, not
> to wait from Permission from someone who will hold the highest
> office in the Executive.
>      I was a private citizen too but I paid attention
> and voted as often as legal. Reagan was an Republican Ahole
> and among other idiocy ended childcare for single women
> who were working for a living.
> 
>      bliss
> 

Mea Culpa.

pt