| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<va8729$htuf$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 13:28:56 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 21 Message-ID: <va8729$htuf$4@dont-email.me> References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <en_fjxuLKegQPxOwdC8lXsKVbbI@jntp> <b6f3db1f122addc847d551f14766c9bc090a2d39@i2pn2.org> <va1ra4$3bld7$1@dont-email.me> <cB1y4KsEseyrfvMXAJJ2TijMcX4@jntp> <va31ko$3havl$1@dont-email.me> <VqqLFKi62z9rl82Gg4Mxsdp4YYg@jntp> <va4h96$3r7nv$1@dont-email.me> <H5iV5HXUBwUzWtVKRZj7h4N2LdA@jntp> <va543m$3u6dp$1@dont-email.me> <kN73KZJabPuiasJJ0DR6UOOrMHE@jntp> <va7hig$fb5h$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 22:28:58 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c767e25c1aa7b1654b0a8f1cf7df9e85"; logging-data="587727"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18vWQhtYhaDjSNBmkBc0nK99Xx377s8eOo=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:3I7M/cmotuv9Nh744mcI243teaU= In-Reply-To: <va7hig$fb5h$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2108 On 8/22/2024 7:22 AM, FromTheRafters wrote: > WM used his keyboard to write : >> Le 21/08/2024 à 18:20, FromTheRafters a écrit : >>> WM presented the following explanation : >> >>>> Since no unit fraction is below or at zero, the end is before. What >>>> else? >>> >>> No end, Duh!! >> >> In a linear order of elements which all have distances from each >> other, there is necessarily a last one (if nothing follows) because >> the only alternative would be more than one. > > You are thinking finitely again. > >> Matheologial conjuring trick is outside of mathematics. > > Stating something over and over does not make it true. Ding! :^)