Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<va8ubb$p76k$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Dave Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: New VSI post on Youtube
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 23:06:35 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <va8ubb$p76k$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v9ehs5$3mqbj$1@dont-email.me> <v9idff$f9k4$1@dont-email.me>
 <v9iqln$hrs3$1@dont-email.me> <v9iro6$fql6$1@dont-email.me>
 <66bcf876$0$717$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <66bcfbe3$0$717$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <v9kske$uqhh$2@dont-email.me>
 <va04hl$2viks$2@dont-email.me> <66c397f6$0$716$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <va226u$3ce14$1@dont-email.me> <va22l3$3cdrf$4@dont-email.me>
 <lik2d5Fkf4uU3@mid.individual.net> <va67af$6mpa$4@dont-email.me>
 <va7t4k$h0sn$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 05:06:19 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3bca35999a53b64ba1709a3a5672cc52";
	logging-data="826580"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+sQwBHypetlGDntvPyb3U+rikAD+O14gE="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.8.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:aaMH67rwhllWBLFpf4t4+di5OPU=
In-Reply-To: <va7t4k$h0sn$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3254

On 8/22/2024 1:39 PM, Simon Clubley wrote:
> On 2024-08-21, Dave Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> wrote:
>> On 8/20/2024 1:34 PM, bill wrote:
>>> On 8/20/2024 8:36 AM, Simon Clubley wrote:
>>>> On 2024-08-20, chrisq <devzero@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess another complication is that some functions return
>>>>> -1, which implies a signed variable. To fix all that would require a
>>>>> complete rewrite of the library and probably most of the os and
>>>>> applications as well, so it will never happen. Just have to write
>>>>> unsigned equivalents, or slip functions with casts, but it's a lot
>>>>> of additional work.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> One thing I wish was available in all languages is the ability to return
>>>> multiple values from a function call so you can return both a status and
>>>> the value(s) in one assignment. Ie: "a, b, c = demo_function(param1, param2);".
>>>>
>>>> In languages with dynamic associative arrays (such as PHP), I simulate
>>>> this by returning an associative array from a function call with both
>>>> status and value fields. Makes coding _so_ much cleaner and robust.
>>>>
>>>
>>> And probably much harder to understand in anything but the most
>>> trivial usage.
>>>
>>
>> Would that not be rather clear with adequate comments about what is being done?
>>
>
> Look at the example Arne posted. Very clean and very easy to understand
> without having to use comments (and I am actually a fan of the liberal
> use of comments. :-) ).
>
> Simon.
>

I find it rather difficult to determine WHY something is being done, just from 
the code.

-- 
David Froble                       Tel: 724-529-0450
Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc.      E-Mail: davef@tsoft-inc.com
DFE Ultralights, Inc.
170 Grimplin Road
Vanderbilt, PA  15486