Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<va9tpv$te1n$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 15:03:11 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 13 Message-ID: <va9tpv$te1n$1@dont-email.me> References: <m_uze6jFLkrMPuR4XaNmQntFPLY@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 14:03:12 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bfc65ec5aa48ce91b41c9d094026f89c"; logging-data="964663"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/7F5hvNrn56a6TxD6r2Akh" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:JTbkZRkm7Kcri2dx6XePv0GeBXo= Bytes: 1368 On 2024-08-23 11:15:38 +0000, Richard Hachel said: > When I read the contributors to the French and Anglo-Saxon forums, when > I read Einstein (three lines of explanation) or Poincaré (one line of > explanation), I realize that it is very insufficient. You are free to read other authors if you think those two are insufficient. After all, they have had more time to think how to explain, probably also more experience about explaining. -- Mikko