Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 16:01:58 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <vaa4om$sicr$16@dont-email.me>
References: <m_uze6jFLkrMPuR4XaNmQntFPLY@jntp> <va9tpv$te1n$1@dont-email.me>
 <uFAyL-g_jsWF5wwLXINmyrzxquo@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 16:01:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7921468d9213e9a0d58f1779c891968d";
	logging-data="936347"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19YFg0I7Q2D4qi2213bD9km"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NGA0ng3tWAYViYzw8rtSpgJOFAc=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <uFAyL-g_jsWF5wwLXINmyrzxquo@jntp>
Bytes: 2084

Le 23/08/2024 à 14:20, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
> Le 23/08/2024 à 14:03, Mikko a écrit :
>> On 2024-08-23 11:15:38 +0000, Richard Hachel said:
>>
>>> When I read the contributors to the French and Anglo-Saxon forums, when
>>> I read Einstein (three lines of explanation) or Poincaré (one line of
>>> explanation), I realize that it is very insufficient.
>>
>> You are free to read other authors if you think those two are 
>> insufficient.
>> After all, they have had more time to think how to explain, probably also
>> more experience about explaining.
> 
> Lire ne suffit pas.
> 
> Chacun lit ce que d'autres ont lu, et on tourne en rond.
> 
> Il faut ré-écrire les choses, et si possible en langage universellement 
> compréhensible, afin que cela soit clair pour tous, et qu'on arrête un 
> peu ce grand bluff minkowskien qui pourrit l'histoire de l'humanité.

It is quite contradictory to praise for the use of a comprehensible 
language in *French* into a English-speaking group.