Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Sync two clocks
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 21:03:40 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <vaamcg$10p78$2@dont-email.me>
References: <u18wy1Hl3tOo1DpOF6WVSF0s-08@jntp>
 <aeuL_3xao9-_kSf51ssMUTgW-s8@jntp> <va6rjs$c7ca$1@dont-email.me>
 <66c6fe9d$0$3360$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <va72t9$blq6$4@dont-email.me>
 <omIg9w0Iy0ZX5hSc9cLG74AlKY0@jntp> <f15x-DXi9mk6sbBPa_gf0bWPArc@jntp>
 <va7veu$hfcs$1@dont-email.me> <Kjl4WjK9KQqBWo5XbMcErn2fRTY@jntp>
 <va9rek$t321$1@dont-email.me> <DKO8ZECjU5PrMeOCELsikzoTpnA@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 21:02:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fe3f46768257599c622d71dc2f0fd581";
	logging-data="1074408"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Zn1mnL4dXEKVgENkVebEf"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cC3bVO3duJZuZ6oLVwSlhK+YCRk=
In-Reply-To: <DKO8ZECjU5PrMeOCELsikzoTpnA@jntp>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2456

Den 23.08.2024 13:54, skrev Richard Hachel:
> Le 23/08/2024 à 13:23, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
>> Den 22.08.2024 21:12, skrev Richard Hachel:
>> 
>>> I too am talking about the notion of simultaneity, 
>>> but am I sure we are talking about the same thing?
>>> Is Einstein talking about the same thing?  >>
>> I am quite certain that Einstein wasn't talking about
>> the same thing as Richard Hachel.

> 
> It's obvious.

Indeed!

Einstein never talked about what Richard Hachel talks about:

> I have already made many complaints to you, and among them the rotation 
> that you make by changing the frame of reference, I explained to you 
> that there was no rotation, but translation in x (y and z remaining 
> invariant).
> Your new point in R' is therefore erroneous each time. In addition, you 
> keep an invariant time To since your distance d becomes invariant. All 
> this is not serious, but it is not your fault.
> It is that of German thought (Einstein, Minkowski).
> 
> R.H.

But what _are_ you talking about, Rickard?
The notion of simultaneity?

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/