Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vaba3p$1uh5$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: About WiFi7 Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 20:39:20 -0400 Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com) Lines: 147 Message-ID: <vaba3p$1uh5$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> References: <va78n1$1ifd7$1@solani.org> <va7rd4$14gv$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <va98fq$1j36c$1@solani.org> <vaa78t$5jo$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vaaafv$1jkec$1@solani.org> <vaadim$1ot4$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vaao50$112hi$2@dont-email.me> <vaapei$1hse$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vab3qa$12s47$1@dont-email.me> <vab4qh$s6l$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vab5ts$12s47$3@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 00:39:21 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com; logging-data="64037"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com" Cancel-Lock: sha1:JSXlEkV0CKZUZxZI4dF2dRKCTnc= sha256:EBr7FvGOl8YbXbCHOEu2CUoN0uXI05v+o+Kt2j2ngqA= sha1:8k2K1orvGFH1d1Gr4EJ25mT8C0o= sha256:c8ok95cAvKfYJSFSAk3Ip3NaIYpT/CLD4IENjKCKQGk= X-Priority: 3 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 Bytes: 8408 "Don Y" <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message news:vab5ts$12s47$3@dont-email.me... > On 8/23/2024 4:09 PM, Edward Rawde wrote: >> "Don Y" <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message news:vab3qa$12s47$1@dont-email.me... >>> On 8/23/2024 12:54 PM, Edward Rawde wrote: >>>> "Don Y" <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message news:vaao50$112hi$2@dont-email.me... >>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:32 AM, Edward Rawde wrote: >>>>>> Someone else mentioned cars. I prefer to keep my car off wifi. No need for the car to use it. >>>>>> https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/14/texas_sues_general_motors/ >>>>> >>>>> *I* mentioned cars. And, I use WiFi only to connect the car to the automation >>>>> system in the house. So, if the garage door is inhibited from opening to >>>>> allow the driver access, the driver can view a live image of the interior >>>>> of the garage to see WHY the door is not being allowed to open (someone >>>>> working in the garage, power failure, stuff in the path of the vehicle, >>>>> pets wandering around, etc.) >>>> >>>> I'd put a camera in the garage for that. PoE Wired. >>> >>> Have several tied into the opener. Is anyone working on a ladder ABOVE >>> the door rails? Is anything in the path of the car? Is anything moving >>> around (animals, kids) inside the closed garage? etc. Use this information >>> BEFORE allowing the door opener to be actuated. >>> >>> But, how do you let the *driver* "see" the "situation" inside the closed >>> garage as he approaches the residence? >> >> Telepathy? Why does it matter? If my garage door didn't open I'd park outside the garage and then investigate why. > > So, you would be inconvenienced. Fine. Why have a garage at all? > Why not "settle" for parking on the street ALL THE TIME? Never mind. > >>>>> Would you, instead, like that to be conveyed to your ISP via your access point, >>>>> over-the-air to your cell phone -- which you will have to access in order to >>>>> "see" the scene? All those third-parties on which you will rely? >>>> >>>> What does my ISP have to do with packets traveling between devices on my LAN?? >>> >>> Do you have a long cord connecting your LAN to the car as it approaches from >>> down the street? >> >> Why would anyone need to see inside their garage as they approach from down the street?? > > You don't -- unless the door doesn't want to open on your command. Here, > if that happened because SWMBO was digging through the freezer chest and > the dogs were at her feet, I would TELL her to get the dogs in the house > so I could pull in. How would you know in advance that the door wasn't going to open on your command? How would you tell her? By phone? Isn't that inconvenient? I would put the freezer in the house and make sure the garage door is not obstructed by dogs or anything else. Problem solved. > > Why would they need a garage door opener? Why would that opener need safety > features? If the nose of your car hangs above the photoelectric sensors, > will the door KNOW this? Or, will it gladly close on your door, putting a > crease in your hood (when the over-current sensor on the motor detected the > "obstruction" -- BY TOUCH)? Sorry but I'm beginning to wonder whether you live on the same planet as me. > >>>> I don't and won't use cameras which bounce off the manufacturer's servers outside my LAN. >>>> >>>>> Why not use all those LCD screens already in place in the car (and, have that >>>>> happen automatically when you engage the garage door opener)? >>>>> >>>>> There's nothing you can do to keep your car from "tattling" to the dealership, >>>>> manufacturer, credit bureau, etc. I've often wondered if it would throw a fit >>>>> if you, e.g., shorted it;s antenna! >>>> >>>> What specific antenna or data communication means are you referring to? >>> >>> Most modern cars talk to the dealerships/manufacturers. >> >> Sure but is that by WiFi, bluetooth, or direct connection or does that depend on the car? > > That's not under your control. My WiFi use *is* under my control -- I own the > AP and the radio in the car. No one else can connect to those things. > >> If the location which does my oil change is uploading my driving habits to the car manufacturer then I would certainly like to >> know >> about that. > > They don't have to. The CAR does it. By what means? Please describe the specific communication channel the car is using when it uploads my driving habits to the manufacturer. > They, as a service to you, will reset > the "maintenance minder" (that the car controls based on mileage, habits, > etc.). The car *likely* would convey the event "Maintenance Minder Reset" > to the vendor. By what communication channel? > So, the vendor knows that SOMEONE serviced your vehicle > (and they can easily determine that it wasn't the dealer -- because the > dealer has no record of servicing your vehicle). Provide the GPS > coordinates (available to the car at all times!) Jamming GPS isn't hard but we needn't go into that. > along with the notification > of the "indicator has been reset" and it's not hard for someone to figure > out *who* serviced your car. > > The car likely tattles about your usage in order to help the dealership > sell services to you -- and, this as a "convenience FOR you"! (so YOU > don't have to remember when the car needs service) > > Vendors obviously have access to usage data as they have been caught > selling it to third parties. > > Lots of information "leaks" in data exchanges. I was able to tell my > sister which days her (ex) husband had skipped work (to visit his > girlfriend!) just from a casual look through his cell phone records. > ("Why is he in Town X as he is making this call instead of Town Y -- where > he WORKS?") > > [I can tell -- to a high degree of certainty -- if someone in my house took > a bath, shower, or shit (and, whether or not he washed his hands!), based on > how long he was in the bathroom, the total volume of water consumed and its > rate of flow.] You must be popular with visitors. > >>> Ever wonder how MY >>> dealership knows not to pester me for a 5000 mile service after the typical >>> 3-4 months that most folks would encounter -- instead, waiting for a full >>> year to tickle me with a USPS "coupon" for a discount on that service? >>> *Who* is telling him about my driving habits? Who is telling LexisNexis about >>> your driving habits? >>> >>> I tell the guy who does my routine maintenance NOT to reset the service >>> indicator at his facility but, instead, to let ME do it "wherever I want" >>> (as the location data captured at that event would be valuable to the >>> dealership/manufacturer: "Where is he getting his service as it has >>> NOT been from the dealer!??") > >