Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vabgom$ppa$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!s1-1.netnews.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: About WiFi7 Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 22:32:53 -0400 Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com) Lines: 274 Message-ID: <vabgom$ppa$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> References: <va78n1$1ifd7$1@solani.org> <va7rd4$14gv$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <va98fq$1j36c$1@solani.org> <vaa78t$5jo$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vaanpe$112hi$1@dont-email.me> <vaarue$gq1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vab51q$12s47$2@dont-email.me> <vab8kd$md1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vabe2r$142d4$1@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 02:32:54 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com; logging-data="26410"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com" Cancel-Lock: sha1:6kBPRAf8YA5Gn3CGH/ft1xDP2dw= sha256:yjbgyGty2MV2v85/UGFgyxPqqH2RWU2/gr8WgPgip7o= sha1:rBaZrxOL0Lu4EKD4h0Kxyra0uWQ= sha256:CIk++lRO8g9gHXb/60z87ffXfcKc9zgFRw5cxB2zWfA= X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Priority: 3 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response Bytes: 13667 "Don Y" <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message news:vabe2r$142d4$1@dont-email.me... > On 8/23/2024 5:14 PM, Edward Rawde wrote: >>>> But I don't see how an air-gapped network is a network. >>>> I would not be able to get anything done. >>> >>> If everything you need is IN that network, then why open it up to potential >>> adversaries? >> >> I don't have anything open to potential adversaries. > > Of course you do. You just don't THINK you do! > >>> I have scanners, printers, in-circuit-emulators, CAD/CAE >>> systems, etc. all "a click away" >> >> So do I. > > So, then I guess MINE is a network, right? > >>> -- without ever leaving the confines of >>> my home/office. >> >> I can use mine from any country I'm likely to be in. > > How do you place the documents in the scanner? Pick the pages up > off the printer? Turn the power on to the DUT you are debugging > with the ICE? > >>> If I need to find a datasheet, I can move to THIS machine, locate the >>> datasheet, download it to a thumb drive and sneakernet it into the >>> office. How often do you need to do *that*? >> >> Every few minutes, and I can do it all from where I sit, even if I go to another country. > > Really? How HUGE must your designs be to need you to spend all that > time constantly downloading NEW datasheets? Do you ever READ any of them? > How *trivial* are the designs if you are able to move on to MORE datasheets > after "using" the previous ones? > >>>> I came across an individual with three virus scanners installed a few days ago. >>>> I didn't bother giving advice, I just left them to waste hours running scans. >>>> I did ask when they last found a virus and was confidently told "never". >>> >>> I have no such tools "installed", here. >> >> Same here. Just the default Microsoft scanner. > > Yet you allow updates -- to the OS? Apps? Even the malware scanner? > >>> Every 6 months, I pull the disk from >>> this machine and check the disk pulled 6 months earlier with the "latest" >>> free AV scanner. This gives the tool vendor a chance to catch up with >>> the latest exploits (a 6 month window) which a "current subscriber" can >>> only HOPE to gain protection. >>> >>> I've never found anything. So, either the tools folks are using are >>> ineffective -- or, my internet behavior is pro-actively robust. >> >> Well if you put yourself in prison you're not likely to be bothered by much from outside. > > Gee, I have far more design and personal freedom than any of my colleagues! > And, have had such for decades, now. So much so that they have started > "cutting the cord", as well. > > You are likely RELIANT on the outside world. Me? not so much. > >>> Of course you have a network. I have three 24-port switches in the office >>> (virtually all ports in use) and two 12's in my bedroom. Is this NOT a network >>> because I can walk to all of the nodes? >>> >>> If a person has physical access to YOUR "network", then security is a moot >>> point. Even an encrypted drive is vulnerable -- I *steal* it and I've >>> now effectively denied you service. >> >> Plenty of people have physical access to my network. >> Most of them wouldn't know a switch from a banana. >> Those who would are trusted people. >> Untrusted people who might know what a switch is are simply not allowed anywhere near my physical LAN. > > You've then confirmed my statement. Or, do you just not like folks > to touch your things? > > You can come and stay, overnight, in my guest room. You can use either of > the two drops, there, to access The Internet. You can look and see all of > the devices wired in to the house -- yet can't interfere with any of them > (let alone compromise any of them) without physically walking up to > them and "damaging" them. > > Take a tesla coil and short it to the 8P8C's. Well, there goes YOUR > internet access. But, nothing else (including the switches!) cares. > >>>> I could be writing this post from one country today and another tomorrow. >>> >>> As could I. By using any NNTP agent on any internet connected machine. >>> Why does it have to be one of the machines on my air-gapped network? >> >> Because you'd have missed your flight by the time you find and install one and what if you need that data sheet you left on your >> office computer? > > If the datasheet CAME from The Internet, why can't I now relocate it > ON The Internet? > > When you travel, do you not take a phone and/or laptop WITH you? > Do the places you visit not have libraries and public access places? > Do none of the colleagues/friends/businesses that you visit have > laptops or workstations that they will let you use? > > NNTP, email, WWW are ubiquitous services. There's no need to > burden yourself trying to support something "special". > >> Sure you can download it but was that LT1234 or LT2341 or LTC1324? and what if you'd really like to have the LTSpice simulation >> you >> did at the office? > > If I was going to be away from the office long enough that something that I > HADN'T PLANNED ON WORKING ON became significant, then I would be a piss poor > worker. > > I was called home for a medical emergency. I grabbed my checkbook (so I > would know what periodic bills were coming due along with the related > paying methods), a laptop and copied some files onto it. The emergency > dragged on for 3 months. I was never in need of anything that I didn't have > with me *or* that I couldn't get using a neighbor's AP (my folks don't > have internet service). > > I was even able to design the artwork for some "aprons" and "book bags" > for the local library's volunteer organization and email the artwork to them. > > True, I was unable to replant the tree that toppled in the back yard during > a storm that occurred while I was away. But, my *work* was unaffected. > > Having big projects makes it relatively easy to be able to work on *something* > even if it wasn't what you may have originally planned. > > [The parts I tried to order this week are not here -- but, I can divert my > time to creating more test cases for my gesture recognizer. Or, documenting > the virtual memory interface in my RTOS. Or...] > >>>> Countries I never go to (Mostly non-English speaking countries) are blocked inbound by pfsense. >>> >>> Wonderful. And you have to maintain that. Instead of doing "real work". >> >> LOL these people maintain it for me: >> https://www.maxmind.com/en/home > > They came over to your house to install it? And, the updates? And, rewrite > special rules for your access? All for free?? > >>> Your browser can be fingerprinted. They (the sites you visit) may not know >>> your *name* (yet) but, know that "you" are visiting site X, Y and Z. Are >>> you sure they aren't sharing information about your visits? >> >> Fairly sure yes. I can tell because You Tube doesn't offer relevant (or so it thinks) videos whenever I restart my browser. > > That's specious reasoning. > > "My house hasn't been burglarized so I *know* it is secure..." > >>> The same is true of most developers -- especially folks writing software. >>> Have someone pay you to break the design you just "finished" and you (and >>> they) will forever see your *design* efforts in a different light! >>> >>> How hard to you work at trying to identify conditions that can/will break >>> your design? >> >> Depends on what I'm designing and what it will be used for. > > Ah, so you only care about quality *sometimes*? > >>>>> [Do you think a 50 million LoC piece of software doesn't have tens of >>>>> thousands of latent bugs?? Bugs that can be identified, verified and >>>>> quantified without your ever being aware that this has happened?] >>>>> >>>>> Consider, carefully, what you really need access to outside of your own >>>>> physical domain. >>>> >>>> Oh I have, for a long time. >>>> So for me I can work from anywhere I might need to work from as if I was here, and all my files are here (not in any cloud). >>> >>> Thus they are all accessible -- to a determined adversary, as well. >> ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========