Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vac196$1ad6s$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!news.dfncis.de!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.research
Subject: Re: Inertia and third principle
Date: 24 Aug 2024 08:46:57 GMT
Organization: -
Lines: 25
Approved: hees@itp.uni-frankfurt.de (sci.physics.research)
Message-ID: <vac196$1ad6s$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v5357b$31hot$1@dont-email.me> <v5bk0b$taot$1@dont-email.me> <v5onk7$3skou$1@dont-email.me> <v62st1$234qv$1@dont-email.me> <v6j6ll$1c2i9$1@dont-email.me> <v72fvt$jcct$1@dont-email.me> <v7immp$1uej$1@dont-email.me> <v87fm1$ct7f$1@dont-email.me> <v8ki29$3a7sa$1@dont-email.me> <v8nask$3uqln$1@dont-email.me> <v8podn$h48j$1@dont-email.me> <v90lgs$3bfo1$1@dont-email.me> <v920hu$3rsb8$1@dont-email.me> <v9287a$3u0v3$1@dont-email.me> <v9d8db$3bi06$1@dont-email.me> <v9fhpj$3ser2$1@dont-email.me> <v9kkdo$u0np$1@dont-email.me> <v9nqie$1fp4h$1@dont-email.me>
X-Trace: news.dfncis.de zJg6YIqO3IlSKZTj8S4lNg1iZGo5fMNEfiaHQP17fROeRXuQ4fjV0QvzHR
Cancel-Lock: sha1:yRwVM+Pkx/ZzR+DFY1wuGxUz9/g= sha256:JUouo1qSemqsJ5O0GSn+1JXfUFNGSaLqvGJZc3fINMk=
Bytes: 2278

On 2024-08-23 14:34:29 +0000, Luigi Fortunati said:

> Mikko il 15/08/2024 15:52:30 ha scritto:
>>> There is some error in my previous post, which I have corrected here.
>>>
>>> The force compresses if it encounters a reaction and accelerates if it does not.
>>
>> In a typical collision the interaction first compresses both bodies and
>> then acclerates them. The amount of compression and acceleration of the
>> bodies need not be same. In come cases the direction of acceleration can
>> be opposite to the direction of motion so the speed is reduced.
>>
>> Sometimes one of the bodies is so massive that the acceleration is too
>> small to be detected, e.g. when someting falls to the ground.
>
> These are generic considerations that demonstrate neither equality nor
> inequality between the action and reaction of the two bodies.

My intent was not to demonstrate what needn't be demostrated, only that
your reasoning involves false assumptions. Those whose opöinion matters
believe in Newtons's third law until otherwise is proven and, so it more
than enough to point out that you have not proven.

-- 
Mikko