Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: [SR and synchronization] Cognitive Dissonances and Mental
 Blockage
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 09:26:04 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <vaemac$1q24g$3@dont-email.me>
References: <v9q6eu$1tlm9$1@dont-email.me> <liduroFtbroU2@mid.individual.net>
 <v9sh1e$2apq2$3@dont-email.me> <lig7svF8jpgU10@mid.individual.net>
 <v9vfe6$2qll6$10@dont-email.me> <liiprgFlcbgU3@mid.individual.net>
 <va1cbf$38k24$2@dont-email.me> <lilev0F2nlqU4@mid.individual.net>
 <va44jr$3p3aa$2@dont-email.me> <lio4hqFf36mU5@mid.individual.net>
 <va75js$blq6$6@dont-email.me> <liqnlhFr49eU3@mid.individual.net>
 <vaa3mm$sicr$11@dont-email.me> <litf80F8oi1U8@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 09:26:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7801f336f702aca5f177fe01780d0c8d";
	logging-data="1902736"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/XYGo1+35obUnUNaC8KQUW"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SD7yIlciJhPz1w047KoRRNXYl0U=
In-Reply-To: <litf80F8oi1U8@mid.individual.net>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3017

Le 24/08/2024 à 09:09, Thomas Heger a écrit :
> Am Freitag000023, 23.08.2024 um 15:43 schrieb Python:
> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> I wrote annotations from a certain perspective:
>>>>>
>>>>> I treated the text in question as homework of a student and myself 
>>>>> as hypothetical professor, who had to write corrections for that 
>>>>> paper.
>>>>
>>>> You cannot pretend to be a professor, even hypothetical, when dealing
>>>> with subject you are both ignorant of and too stupid to understand.
>>>
>>> I have already written, that this is a certain perspective of writing.
>>>
>>> I could - for instance - write a novel from the perspective of JFK, 
>>> after being shot.
>>>
>>> You could complain, this is not possible.
>>>
>>> Sure, most likely this isn't.
>>>
>>> BUT: it's the author, who choses the writing perspective and not the 
>>> reader.
>>
>> The reader can evaluate the quality and soundness of a text. Yours
>> is abysmally bad and absolutely unsound.
> 
> Well, nobody required from you, that you have to like my 'annotations'.
> 
> But in case of science, you need to substantiate your critique a little 
> more than by just expressiong your dislike.
> 
> For instance, you could disprove a few of my annotations:
> 
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RkhX-B5u7X4ga0QH-C53RddjQGctZVdo/view

I've already disproved your claim about Einstein not taking into account
light propagation time when synchronizing clocks.

A LOT of people have disprove most of you annotations: they are ALL
utterly idiotic and nonsensical.