Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: V5 --- Professor Sipser --- trace of HHH on DDD input
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 10:53:03 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <vaensv$1qd66$1@dont-email.me>
References: <va104l$376ed$4@dont-email.me> <va3f7o$3ipp3$1@dont-email.me> <729cc551062c13875686d266a5453a488058e81c@i2pn2.org> <va3kac$3nd5c$1@dont-email.me> <148bf4dd91f32379a6d81a621fb7ec3fc1e00db0@i2pn2.org> <va3lai$3nd5c$2@dont-email.me> <va46sd$3pr24$1@dont-email.me> <va4mle$3s0hu$1@dont-email.me> <5591ff08ed8f7b4bdf33813681e156b775efe0ec@i2pn2.org> <va63uu$2fo9$1@dont-email.me> <b0a86b6a1343ebb5f9112ae757768a7cbbc770b2@i2pn2.org> <va65r8$6ht7$1@dont-email.me> <26fadbf7b8cb5f93dbe18bffeff6e959251f9892@i2pn2.org> <va6b4n$7boc$1@dont-email.me> <b19eb2a29dacfa67f2f9ced0d03234e980f4c985@i2pn2.org> <va6edj$8f0p$1@dont-email.me> <e20689d26c224e4923146d425843348539ce6065@i2pn2.org> <va7tb3$h3la$1@dont-email.me> <2c6dfb2e8cdafc17fd833599dfba3843f56a281a@i2pn2.org> <vaavkc$128hl$1@dont-email.me> <vac6ns$1atfd$1@dont-email.me> <vacmpa$1d5dd$1@dont-email.me> <57c86522e95be7746b2d2864b20d6cd129552990@i2pn2.org> <vacr3e$1e36g$1@dont-email.me> <vaddgl$1ghhg$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 09:53:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4a1e075758d3b81c5eb716e4b00c8a1b";
	logging-data="1914054"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+lhkiiQYPL+7sMNY44cwNE"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wohLjlIqY95xnEUU3cMIchGlRho=
Bytes: 3501

On 2024-08-24 19:49:42 +0000, Fred. Zwarts said:

> Op 24.aug.2024 om 16:35 schreef olcott:
>> On 8/24/2024 9:27 AM, joes wrote:
>>> Am Sat, 24 Aug 2024 08:21:45 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>> On 8/24/2024 3:47 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>> Op 23.aug.2024 om 23:40 schreef olcott:
>>>>>> On 8/23/2024 2:24 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>> Am Thu, 22 Aug 2024 12:42:59 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Only IF it will in fact keep repeating, which is not the case.
>>>>>> Only IF it *WOULD* in fact keep repeating, *which is the case*
>>>>> It is the case only if you still cheat with the Root variable, which
>>>>> makes that HHH processes a non-input, when it is requested to predict
>>>>> the behaviour of the input.
>>>> The fact is that it *WOULD* in fact keep repeating,
>>>> thus *IT DOES* get the correct answer.
>> 
>>> The simulated, aborting HHH would… abort.
>> 
>> <MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
>>     If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D
>>     until H correctly determines that its simulated D would never
>>     stop running unless aborted then
>> 
> Why repeating this over and over again if you do not understand the words?
> Sipser agreed to 'If ... correctly simulates ... correctly determines ...'.
> There is no correct simulation, there is no correct determination, so 
> the remainder of the sentence does not apply.
> Maybe you should read it a few more times, until you understand what 
> 'if' means.
> Maybe use a dictionary to learn the meaning of English words.

For certain words like "if" and "would" a grammar book might be better.

-- 
Mikko