Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vafltb$1vf5n$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_=E2=80=9CDid_nobody_stop_to_think_what_might_happen?= =?UTF-8?Q?_in_an_emergency_in_space=3F=E2=80=9D?= Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 12:25:15 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 37 Message-ID: <vafltb$1vf5n$1@dont-email.me> References: <vaaphl$11duc$1@dont-email.me> <crvjcjd22toerla6sd413an7hve6ua1k66@4ax.com> <vafi7q$520$1@panix2.panix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 18:25:15 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="08e1b64b8d6051594ad704d00f7f8667"; logging-data="2079927"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19aBaF11ufkfjXvh1BlHM1VocvRJrdTHfE=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:V92C8Z949QVWGyUKQPccGN8u22o= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vafi7q$520$1@panix2.panix.com> Bytes: 2686 On 8/25/2024 11:22 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote: > Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote: >> <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> The Boeing spacesuit is made to work with the Starliner spacecraft, >>> and the SpaceX spacesuit is made to work with the Dragon spacecraft, >>> NASA told Fox News Digital. =93Both were designed to fit each unique >>> spacecraft. >>> >>> Oops. I suspect that SpaceX will send up a couple of new space suits on=20 >>> the next supply spaceship. > > For Apollo-Soyuz, the Soviets made up some adaptor boxes that went from the > American space suit connections to the Russian ones (as well as the adaptor > ring to connect the two capsules). I am surprised this is not a solution. > >> See, /this/ is why the ISO exists. > > The ISO isn't really all that useful in the real world, partly because they > promote standards without reference to how systems are used in the real world > and partly because they charge money for the standards meaning small > organizations are strongly discouraged from following new ISO standards that > are not already in common use. > > The whole upside-down-wedding cake of networking protocols looked great but > didn't map in practice to what people were really using, and when tcp/ip took > over the world it was like a steamroller over top of the ISO. > --scott > For a of couple years around 1990, I actually had to deal with OSI protocols at MITRE. Good riddance. pt