Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vafsmq$211nh$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Who? Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 20:22:17 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 47 Message-ID: <vafsmq$211nh$1@dont-email.me> References: <CBAARt4EEHThxO17L5beYQ9mMWI@jntp> <vadbad$1gllh$1@dont-email.me> <0sAbsqFI52cGATcKfyoKTJ3cyYo@jntp> <vaf5kr$1s50h$1@dont-email.me> <zsTKlCIaJEJHMXsvtWB5Tgxb-nI@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 20:21:14 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4fd94abd7e52b44d9580d66204d6997f"; logging-data="2131697"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/orAqUBG884bPavq0pz5Ys" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:IPWYDbJ9/SNEMvOyI0zaXG5NWzo= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <zsTKlCIaJEJHMXsvtWB5Tgxb-nI@jntp> Bytes: 2626 Den 25.08.2024 14:34, skrev Richard Hachel: > Le 25/08/2024 à 13:47, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit : >> Den 24.08.2024 22:14, skrev Richard Hachel: >> >> You do understand that you can't make the lunar clock >> change its reading by looking at it, don't you? >> Or don't you? > > Of course, I can't change lunar time by looking at it. You have to be remarkable stupid if you don't understand that the proper time shown by a clock won't change by being looked at. -------------------- > The genius is to say that transactions are instantaneous, and that it is > men's ignorance of the correct space-time that creates this luminic > illusion. OK. Let's start again: Hachel wrote: | I set two identical watches (same chronotropy) on my table and | I slowly move one of them towards the moon (let's say in | three weeks to avoid a v²/c² ratio very different from 1) If we ignore the gravitational blue shift, and pretend that the ECI frame is a true inertial frame, then the lunar clock will lag 0.45 μs on the Earth clock. Which we will ignore, as you said we should. So the clocks are synchronous (within 1 μs). Hachel wrote: |I notice in my telescope that when my watch marks |00:00'08" the lunar clock is desynchronized and marks 00:00'07". Considering that transactions are instantaneous, why do you say that the picture you see in the telescope is 00:00'07, when it obviously should be 00:00'08" (-0.45 μs)? Please explain. -- Paul https://paulba.no/