Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vafsmq$211nh$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Who?
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 20:22:17 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <vafsmq$211nh$1@dont-email.me>
References: <CBAARt4EEHThxO17L5beYQ9mMWI@jntp> <vadbad$1gllh$1@dont-email.me>
 <0sAbsqFI52cGATcKfyoKTJ3cyYo@jntp> <vaf5kr$1s50h$1@dont-email.me>
 <zsTKlCIaJEJHMXsvtWB5Tgxb-nI@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 20:21:14 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4fd94abd7e52b44d9580d66204d6997f";
	logging-data="2131697"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/orAqUBG884bPavq0pz5Ys"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IPWYDbJ9/SNEMvOyI0zaXG5NWzo=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <zsTKlCIaJEJHMXsvtWB5Tgxb-nI@jntp>
Bytes: 2626

Den 25.08.2024 14:34, skrev Richard Hachel:
> Le 25/08/2024 à 13:47, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
>> Den 24.08.2024 22:14, skrev Richard Hachel:
>>
>> You do understand that you can't make the lunar clock
>> change its reading by looking at it, don't you?
>> Or don't you?
> 
> Of course, I can't change lunar time by looking at it.

You have to be remarkable stupid if you don't understand that
the proper time shown by a clock won't change by being looked at.

--------------------

> The genius is to say that transactions are instantaneous, and that it is 
> men's ignorance of the correct space-time that creates this luminic 
> illusion.

OK. Let's start again:

Hachel wrote:
| I set two identical watches (same chronotropy) on my table and
| I slowly move one of them towards the moon  (let's say in
| three weeks to avoid a v²/c² ratio very different from 1)

If we ignore the gravitational blue shift, and pretend that
the ECI frame is a true inertial frame, then the lunar clock will
lag 0.45 μs on the Earth clock.
Which we will ignore, as you said we should.
So the clocks are synchronous (within 1 μs).

Hachel wrote:
|I notice in my telescope that when my watch marks
|00:00'08" the lunar clock is desynchronized and marks 00:00'07".

Considering that transactions are instantaneous,
why do you say that the picture you see in the telescope
is 00:00'07, when it obviously should be 00:00'08" (-0.45 μs)?

Please explain.

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/